Good point, it would serve as a means to monitor even though donation itself probably wouldn't have any significant effect. I've been meaning to start donating for a while, I should get my act together.
I wonder whether blood donation might offer some reduction or whether that's overly simplistic.
I started that one a few years ago out of interest in Jungian archetypes but I quickly tapped out when I realised it's not about Jungian archetypes, it's about Men Who Take Turns Crying Together.
My impression is it's one of those books where any people who need it will never read it and the people who'll read it probably don't need it.
All sides have their accelerationists who imagine that just x% more of what they hate will shock the masses out of their false consciousness. What that strategy ignores is that the polity can remain unfavourable longer than you can remain politically relevant.
Shamima Begum is back in the news with news that the European Court of Human Rights are questioning the UK Home Office's decision to remove her citizenship on the basis that she may have been "groomed" and "trafficked" into joining ISIS.
In a document published by the ECHR earlier this month, it states that Ms Begum is challenging the decision to revoke her British citizenship under Article 4 of the European Convention of Human Rights - prohibition of slavery and forced labour.
The four questions posed by judges in Strasbourg to the Home Office, include: "Did the Secretary of State have a positive obligation, by virtue of Article 4 of the Convention, to consider whether the applicant had been a victim of trafficking, and whether any duties or obligations to her flowed from that fact, before deciding to deprive her of her citizenship?"
Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said Ms Begum "chose to go and support the violent Islamist extremists".
He added: "She has no place in the UK and our own Supreme Court found that depriving her of citizenship was lawful.
"It is deeply concerning the European Court of Human Rights is now looking at using the ECHR to make the UK take her back."
If the UK is manoeuvered into allowing Begum to return at the the behest of the European courts it will be political suicide for the government, an open goal for the far right, but what gets me is how it will foreseeably be consequently counterproductive for the very demographics that human rights activists seek to defend! It will pour fuel on reactionary sentiment and division. I think that the functional part of Labour understand this, and will be working hard to make sure it doesn't happen, but I worry that the activist section of the back benches will work against them, ignorant (wilfully?) of the prospect of ushering in a Reform government on a swelling tide of rightist sentiment. It's like a moral puritanism that denies the political reality of trade-offs. Sure, there might be a hard right UK government, but it won't be their fault - they stood against it!
Has it stopped?
Sorry, I'm being flippant. I don't follow Israel/Palestine beyond it being the background radiation of international news for my entire life. As such it strikes me as almost humorous to predict it might re-ignite when its continual conflict appears as perennial as the sun rising.
Israel-palestine conflict reignites
Prediction: Sun rises tomorrow.
If anything I found it less culture warry and more entertaining than Knives Out 1 and 2, with 2 being particularly bad, but it's pretty clear at this point that assembling a spread of culture war punch bags and pitting them against each other is the established format for Knives Out.
The part that stood out to me the most was the church building. I didn't realise there were such textbook English parish churches in America with lych gates and yew trees and everything, and apparently they're Catholic(?). And now I've taken the time to check and apparently it was filmed in Essex, which makes a bit more sense.
A partner with more resources can better nurture and educate their blank slate while a partner with less resources can't.
Now you might ask, fairly, "What does this have to do with TDS?" And it's a tough explainer
You've got that right on both counts.
To me it reads like a trademark rambling attempt to ""weave"".
"Before they died they thought I was bad, which obviously means they're crazy and wrong. And they're not really that famous anyway. Death is sad, but at the end of the day I'm the best. Sad. Best. RIP. "
It's less a deft weave and more like two postcards that have been jammed into a shredder at the same time.
Edit: On second thoughts I think it's simpler than that. There was a news headline that wasn't about Trump, and he wanted to divert the attention away from the news and on to himself. Mission accomplished.
The critique I've seen of this idea is that while a paid platform would appear more trustworthy the same trustworthiness would make it equally valuable to marketers who would then pay the admission fee to exploit it.
- Prev
- Next

Speaking of immigrant gangs and large scale fraud reminded me of the various fake colleges scams in the UK.
2014
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/dec/02/students-private-higher-education-colleges-taxpayer-subsidy-benefits-nao-loans
[My bolding]
2009
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2009/may/21/bogus-college-scam
I had to dig in the sources section of Wikipedia to find those links - which I'm not sure were actually the scandal I was looking for - because using a search engine kept returning results of a new student loan scandal that came to light last year: https://aseannow.com/topic/1355961-the-uk-university-fraud-scandal-sham-students-and-fake-degrees/
More options
Context Copy link