BurdensomeCount
Thou Shalt Read BC's Writings!
The neighborhood of Hampstead is just at present exercised with a series of events which seem to run on lines parallel to those of what was known to the writers of headlines and "The Kensington Horror," or "The Stabbing Woman," or "The Woman in Black." During the past two or three days several cases have occurred of young children straying from home or neglecting to return from their playing on the Heath. In all these cases the children were too young to give any properly intelligible account of themselves, but the consensus of their excuses is that they had been with a "bloofer lady." It has always been late in the evening when they have been missed, and on two occasions the children have not been found until early in the following morning. It is generally supposed in the neighborhood that, as the first child missed gave as his reason for being away that a "bloofer lady" had asked him to come for a walk, the others had picked up the phrase and used it as occasion served. This is the more natural as the favorite game of the little ones at present is luring each other away by wiles. A correspondent writes us that to see some of the tiny tots pretending to be the"bloofer lady" is supremely funny. Some of our caricaturists might, he says, take a lesson in the irony of grotesque by comparing the reality and the picture. It is only in accordance with general principles of human nature that the "bloofer lady" should be the popular role at these al fresco performances.
User ID: 628
Imagine you get offered a service, you pay 100k now and in 40 years they'll pay you 50k a year. If in 40 years they change their mind and don't pay, they scammed you. They broke their promise.
Normally when this happens you get to sue them for breach of contract and you win, that gets you a piece of paper and if they have money left over you get it taken from them and given to you. However if they are out of money you just end up with a piece of paper and nothing else, the government doesn't then increase taxation on everyone else in society just to fund your agreement and make sure you are made whole. The fact that there was a promise by the other side and they broke their promise doesn't mean shit.
Something similar can be said to apply to pensions, now you may say that as long as the government itself isn't bankrupt you should get your money because pensions come from a government subsidiary and the government can always increase tax to get enough money to pay for its obligation (or just turn on the printer), but that's not how contracts work either, if you have a contract with B which is a subsidiary of A and then B goes bankrupt in normal situations you don't get to recover from A, you're just out of luck. Similarly with pensions. A government can very easily go "Our pensions department will have X% of government earnings each year, funded from general taxation, if the total liabilities are higher than this then everyone takes a haircut, end of".
So Maoism but funnier? I can get with that.
You mean " "resigned" ", not "resigned".
Much appreciated.
My bad, corrected.
Don't forget that Hegseth fired the Chief of Staff of the US forces literally last week, simply because the General noticed that Hegseth's recent decision on senior promotions in the US military blocked the Black and women candidates who had been recommended while allowing the white men through. The General challenged this prima facie discrimination and his reward was that he got canned for it.
Reading the OpenBSD bug all I can say is that an implementation in Rust wouldn't have this issue.
Complete could also imply that ships from any country can pass through provided they pay the toll, unlike the current situation where only ships flagged or going to certain countries could pass through if they paid a toll.
Ok, that's even more impressive than finding a vulnerability in FreeBSD.
There's a decent chance that in reality the PLA would stomp the US military in any Asia Pacific conflict. Their latest gen weapons are very very efficient and the whole military industrial complex rot that infests the US military doesn't really exist over tere.
Plus, they've already said they're not going to make Mythos public, even if some of the benefits will trickle down to the next Opus. That is not something a company that is desperate for money or willing to ignore safety would do.
Oh, Boo. You can bet your ass the military and big corpo will have access to Mythos, why can't the ordinary man get it too (even for the appropriate fee including a fair margin rate on top of their development + running costs).
Yeah, anti "AI works for coding" person in the top level 2-3 below this one, how do you explain all this? Note that they are providing cryptographic hashes of claimed vulnerabilities today, so we'll see within the next few weeks what these vulnerabilities actually are and if they're trivial we'll all know. Finding a 27y old vulnerability in FreeBSD is up there next level skillz.
Also @self_made_human, you're a regulated doctor, you're one of the least cooked people out there, you'll be protected by laws and regulations long after the rest of us are on the dole.
The Iran war is likely not going to have anywhere near the same amount of benefits as its direct costs. At the very least it's unlikely free Hormuz transit is ever coming back.
I don't understand the people who don't understand how much of a big difference AI is making to software development. Speaking of Software development, this video is great and captures my frustration with a lot of the software developers who I have to work with and yeah for people like that I'd understand completely why AI is bad, all it does is it 10x the amount of slop they produce which then others have to review.
Mostly vendors cranking the screw to squeeze more cash out of us. Worst thing is when providers silently update or change the quantization of the model without making it known. Local Models don't have this problem people (I say this as someone who's managed to get Qwen 3.5 397b-a17b running locally on a server I rented).
- Prev
- Next

If a subsidiary of a government department or a contractor that's 100% owned by the government (we have this in the UK for certain IT and Software development functions) makes a promise and then the subsidiary fails due to lack of cash that doesn't leave the rest of the government liable and you may very well end up out of luck.
Plus we already have the government rug pulling its citizens literally every year every budget. This is something that isn't unique to a specific country or situation.
More options
Context Copy link