@BurdensomeCount's banner p

BurdensomeCount

Thou Shalt Read BC's Writings!

6 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 05 16:37:04 UTC

The neighborhood of Hampstead is just at present exercised with a series of events which seem to run on lines parallel to those of what was known to the writers of headlines and "The Kensington Horror," or "The Stabbing Woman," or "The Woman in Black." During the past two or three days several cases have occurred of young children straying from home or neglecting to return from their playing on the Heath. In all these cases the children were too young to give any properly intelligible account of themselves, but the consensus of their excuses is that they had been with a "bloofer lady." It has always been late in the evening when they have been missed, and on two occasions the children have not been found until early in the following morning. It is generally supposed in the neighborhood that, as the first child missed gave as his reason for being away that a "bloofer lady" had asked him to come for a walk, the others had picked up the phrase and used it as occasion served. This is the more natural as the favorite game of the little ones at present is luring each other away by wiles. A correspondent writes us that to see some of the tiny tots pretending to be the"bloofer lady" is supremely funny. Some of our caricaturists might, he says, take a lesson in the irony of grotesque by comparing the reality and the picture. It is only in accordance with general principles of human nature that the "bloofer lady" should be the popular role at these al fresco performances.


				

User ID: 628

BurdensomeCount

Thou Shalt Read BC's Writings!

6 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 05 16:37:04 UTC

					

The neighborhood of Hampstead is just at present exercised with a series of events which seem to run on lines parallel to those of what was known to the writers of headlines and "The Kensington Horror," or "The Stabbing Woman," or "The Woman in Black." During the past two or three days several cases have occurred of young children straying from home or neglecting to return from their playing on the Heath. In all these cases the children were too young to give any properly intelligible account of themselves, but the consensus of their excuses is that they had been with a "bloofer lady." It has always been late in the evening when they have been missed, and on two occasions the children have not been found until early in the following morning. It is generally supposed in the neighborhood that, as the first child missed gave as his reason for being away that a "bloofer lady" had asked him to come for a walk, the others had picked up the phrase and used it as occasion served. This is the more natural as the favorite game of the little ones at present is luring each other away by wiles. A correspondent writes us that to see some of the tiny tots pretending to be the"bloofer lady" is supremely funny. Some of our caricaturists might, he says, take a lesson in the irony of grotesque by comparing the reality and the picture. It is only in accordance with general principles of human nature that the "bloofer lady" should be the popular role at these al fresco performances.


					

User ID: 628

That's being a care worker, not a proper hospital nurse, and is a very different job which yes I'd agree is low status. I'm thinking more like ICU or Operating theatre helper as "nurse".

Nursing has the whole do gooder schtick attached to it; in the eyes of the normies that beats out the actual difficulty of breaking into the job (the job itself is not easy, I grant you, but then neither is being a janitor, and that's about as low status as you can get).

Yeah, I'd agree. These days it looks like being a quant as well falls into the same category unless you're talking some very select elite groups. For the common person if a man says he's a nurse he'll get more respect than if he says he develops trading models for a living.

Sad times...

Oh, even if it wasn't real Christ, "Christ" did absolutely the right thing here by rejecting the Devil. If everyone follows that reasoning and accepts that they are crazy it means the real Christ also gets caught up by it. Imagine Christ giving in to the Devil in exchange for 100k fewer psychotics across all of human history causing minor disruptions that are forgotten years after they die at the latest. Humanity would be in a very different place today.

Interesting, I don't have any formal benchmark, much like we don't have any formal benchmarkes for the Opus 4.6 degradation beyond people (and AMD) complaining, but that's very much the impression I personally get from using Gemini 3.0+ and ChatGPT (before 5.4).

Google and OAI have already engaged in the enshittification. Their latest models (apart from GPT-5.4, which is genuinely a good model) hallucinate in ways the earlier offerings 6 months ago weren't doing.

People are shitting on the fact that 35% more token usage means they have to pay more for the same text. I'm pissed off by the fact that 35% more token usage means the amount of actual text/code rather than tokens before Opus 4.7 needs to compact is down by around 25% meaning more frequent compactions and worse long context performance.

Just give us back release Opus 4.6, that was a great model.

Yeah, the margins are massive, but someone needs to do the work in the end, and we do it the most efficiently.

Do not forget to thank every day Israel and heroes working in quantitative finance who made it all possible.

I wouldn't say we are heroes but quant finance isn't completely zero sum. It may be almost zero sum on the margins but Phoebe and Co. would notice very quickly if we all disappeared in a poof of smoke.