ChickenOverlord
No bio...
User ID: 218
One of my favorite stories is that Czechoslovakia was an early supporter of Israel and provided them with quite a few guns. Several of these guns were surplus German guns from WW2, so Israelis were literally fighting for their existence using guns emblazoned with swastikas.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arms_shipments_from_Czechoslovakia_to_Israel
Didn't plan it as a gotcha, just wanted to know if you were ideologically consistent
He can advocate for what ever he wants. If his beliefs are around restricting the negative rights of others then he can also face the consequences of what happens when people don't want their rights restricted.
The government should not be in the business of restricting speech, but people are allowed to respond to coordination of violence with violence. To do otherwise is just letting the fantasy of rabbinically-inclined and wordcells to replace reality
Please let us all know how you feel about Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City bombing. After all, he was fighting against the government trying to restrict his right to keep and bear arms.
Doesn't sound that way to me at all, it sounds like he's saying we shouldn't be shocked when a disproportionate fraction of these fuckups get themselves killed while behaving in ways that generally only fuckups do.
Eh, every single military has stupid busywork unrelated to actual military operations. This "raking dirt" meme from someone in the US Army was made back in 2013: https://i.redd.it/a83lodbdko3d1.jpeg
From watching way too many body cam videos, my biggest fear that would keep me being a cop is having to deal with nasty smelly hobos and druggies and their bodily fluids.
Yeah, the only NATO allies that would contribute any significant amount of forces and materiel are Canada, the UK, and France, but even then they wouldn't contribute much compared to the US. There are some NATO militaries like the Finns that I expect would punch above their weight, but they're too small to contribute too much. The US would be doing the bulk of the fighting for NATO in WW3, unlike WW2 when the Brits carried their own weight.
I am not delegating my security to this child with a gun.
Europe was more than happy to do so for decades, and frankly still is given the pitiful increases in military size and weapons production since Russia invaded Ukraine.
My favorites are when, roughly a decade ago, Germany had less than 10 fully armed and operational fighter jets and ZERO operational submarines.
China's recent rare earth policy suggests strongly otherwise.
Additionally, the entire Mexican population of the territories ceded to the US after the Mexican-American War (i.e. California and most of the modern Southwest and Mountain West) was only about 100,000. They were offered US Citizenship under the terms of the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, and roughly 80,000 of them took the opportunity.
By working under the table while also claiming benefits (by stealing someone else's identity). I mean, theoretically a white person can do the same, but there aren't entire state governments dedicated to helping them obtain benefits while being illegal immigrants, and entire DA departments unwilling to prosecute them for it. See this comic/infographic, along with the pathetic attempt to debunk it:
https://imgur.com/fwd-fwd-john-legal-vs-juan-illegal-lA0eug9
There's no contradiction there. He got in front while it was reversing and then stopped in front of it.
You're obviously arguing in bad faith, you've made that abundantly clear with this statement. Her car turned as she was reversing, and this turning is what put him in the way of the car, not his moving. He was moving before her car started moving. Fuck right off if you're going to blatantly lie about what is abundantly clear from the videos.
Which internationally-recognized aid organizations have concluded that starvation in Gaza was a myth? Israelis believe Americans are this gullible, that they can just call something a myth and that makes it so, and they can call something true and that makes it so. There’s a reason America’s approval of Israel has been plummeting. Let me guess, the Norwegian Refugee Council is Hamas?
I'm sure there is starvation in Gaza. Israel's claim is that Hamas seizes aid shipments which prevents them from reaching normal Gazans. Whether or not this claim is true, I can't say, and I can't really find any sources that haven't already picked one side or the other to prove or debunk it.
Him as the villain in the Rock's remake of Walking Tall is the version of him I have stuck in my brain, makes it hard to see him as anything else.
Do you routinely hear people complain about the Iranian diaspora?
There were two Iranian families in my hometown growing up (smallish town of about 30k people) thet had fled after the Shah was overthrown. One of the families had even converted to Mormonism and was a member of my congregation. The one in my my congregation was a wonderful family and I never heard any complaints about them (they had a son with some mental health issues but even that didn't really cause any problems). I had fewer interactions with the other, but the father of the other family was a school psychiatrist/counsellor at my high school and seemed like a decent guy.
But if someone pretty rabidly anti mass migration like me doesn't have any particular beef with Persians I think that's a pretty good sign of the character of the ones we have here in the US, at least the ones who came here in the 70's.
And honestly, learning fourth-dimensional math witchcraft from a rat-human hybrid that can move through walls seems kind of cool actually (though I could do without the ritual baby sacrifice.)
I mean, that story ended with the rat bursting out of the main character's chest to claim the heart he had promised when he signed a contract with Yog Sothoth, so not terribly cool even without the baby sacrifice.
Copypaste this into America and say it's sovereignty; that's odd to me. I may be misunderstanding you.
Not OP but for most it's not a hatred of anything foreign/unamerican (though that can play a role). It's the idea that the citizens of a country have absolute authority over who is or is not allowed to live in a country, regardless of the individual merits (or lack thereof) someone who wants to come live here may have. We may want to allow in talented doctors and engineers etc., but just because you are a talented doctor or engineer doesn't give you any sort of moral right to come here. We can choose exactly how many (or how few) doctors and engineers we want to bring in here, and we can decide we'd prefer more British, French, and Japanese doctors over Zimbabwean, Saudi, and Pakistani doctors or whatever arbitrary distinctions we want to make (more hot women and fewer men, or more tall men fewer short kings, etc.).
The big divide between the right and the left here is that the left is effectively saying we cannot choose who to allow or not allow into our country. Sometimes this is done under specious arguments, i.e. "all of those young Syrian men on the rafts are totally doctors and lawyers and engineers coming to enrich our country and therefore it is wrong to prevent them from coming here" and sometimes it's even more baldfaced (see all of the proactive attempts to protect criminal illegal aliens who have been convicted of heinous crimes like murder and rape from deportation). It's a fundamental mismatch of values, and I don't see it resolved any way other than one side giving up on their values, or one side conquering the other.
Police, including ICE, are told not to stand in front of moving vehicles and not to shoot at their drivers.
He didn't stand in front, he wasn't in front until she reversed. And cops are absolutely allowed to stand in front of parked vehicles to keep them from fleeing.
I already addressed this in my other comment, but cops absolutely can shoot fleeing suspects if they reasonably believe they pose a threat to the cop or others. A lady whipping her car around with reckless disregard for the agents in order to escape (and, to the officer who got hit, with seeming intent to hit him) it is absolutely a justified shoot.
The police cannot shoot someone to stop them from fleeing.
This is flatly untrue. They can, they simply have to have a reasonable belief that the person poses a threat to the officer or others. They can't shoot them solely for fleeing
The probability of someone getting hurt if they just arrest in a her a normal way is absolutely miniscule compared to the guaranteed harm of shooting her to death.
They were trying to arrest her in a normal way, she chose to flee instead. I really don't know how else to explain this to you. If we implemented your (and apparently many leftists') ideals for policing, the clearance rate for all crimes would drop somewhere between 90 to 99%. I'm not exaggerating here.
I'd be willing to let that happen, in exchange for citizens being allowed to blow away criminals without fear of prosecution. But I doubt that's a deal the left would be willing to make. So no, I'm not going to stand by and let the left undermine essential rules and tools for being able to maintain public order.
The car was pointed right at him when the first shot was fired, the wheels didn't turn right until after. Watch the video in slow motion. And regardless, with how fast it happened there was no way for him to know it was turning past him.
But even if they had been, why wouldn't it better for the police to simply pursue the car, stop it, pull her out, and arrest her normally?
Because car chases put the general public in danger. I'd much rather cops just blast people like this then let them put the public at risk.
And lesbian bed death shows you the same for many women
At worst, he would have been knocked over.
And then dragged under
- Prev
- Next

There also used to be a bug on 4chan many years ago where two different images posted at the same time by two different users got swapped, due to uploaded image filenames basically just being their upload timestamp in Unix time. Led to some serious WTF moments in threads from time to time.
More options
Context Copy link