@DBDr's banner p
BANNED USER: /comment/174290

DBDr


				

				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 17 21:05:42 UTC

				

User ID: 1245

Banned by: @cjet79

BANNED USER: /comment/174290

DBDr


				
				
				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 17 21:05:42 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 1245

Banned by: @cjet79

This is kinda sneery but I've always wondered how the IQ realists here square the fact that high IQ is more corelated with liberalism than with any marker of social success; and that low IQ is more corelated with conservatism than with any marker of failure (other than getting charged for felonies).

I guess it just sucks to suck

  • -37

This isn't that, though.

The analogy is to a clear easy solution (remove gun = less perforated children) that conservatives find embarrassing to reject due to 'fuck them kids', so they rapidly become extremally worried about something that they also have no intention to solve but is more complicated (mental health, alienation, whatever).

Your analogy only works if jews actually were poisoning wells.

  • -26

The current War of Northern Aggression "discourse" has brought to mind the top 100 first place greatest mistake in US state craft: not letting Burnen' Sherman just march back and forth for a couple years or finishing hardcore full reconstruction.

Every degenerate tendency in US Con. politics has originated directly from the South's special position as a rebellious territory that was allowed to maintain it's cultural legitimacy, or second order effect from it. Imagine the conservatives we could have in this country if the wellspring of the tendency was John Adams and the federalists; rather than Rutherford and the lost causers.

Wrapping up the entire holographic southern cultural package with opposition to Washington eg. the North, eg the technocratic, rich part of the country has led to a situation where Technocratic Tech-billionaire Technologists are shackled to the cultural traditions of south, either Cavalier hedonistic indulgence papered over with cheap aristocratic pretension lacking any of the actual cultural roots that european aristocrats have; or hill people proud ignorance and shiftless rebellion against anyone who might have gotten any of that big city 'lernin.

You can watch these tendencies poison Republican politics live all the time; it's why even though the Democratic party is jam packed full of passionless ossified corporate aphorism chat bots, when republicans have all three wings of the government they STILL can't get anything done. There is a deep state problem, but it's not the 'unelected bureaucrats' in washington, it's the decaying corpses of Jefferson Davis and Johnny Reb clinging on to conservatism's ankles and dragging it down into the mud.

  • -24

As a leftist who believes in IQ heritability; ya'll need to clean up your argumentation so I can come at it from the other side.

The leftist debate bro rat types who actually engage with HBD topics have all debated HBD types, and complete, utterly smashed them on the rhetoric and the facts when it comes to racial IQ gaps, but have all retreated on the heritability of IQ.

The thing is, the (! MAJORITY OF !)argumentation by the right HBD crowed is so rickety and echo-chamber adapted that it instantly falls apart under any amount of hostile attention and also looks really bad, so it drags down my beloved IQ heritability by making dumb unsupportable racialized arguments instead of sticking to easy population arguments.

  • -17

Not to pile on to a totally unrelated thread as I do just that; but a conception that allows both views (and which I think is true in most cases) is anti-abortion as a cultural signifier.

Ie, most compelled-birthers (probably) have no real concept of what a fetus is and (probably )do not believe in their hearts that an embryo is alive (which we can observe from the prevalence of abortions among anti-abortionists being only marginally smaller than everyone else of their race and class).

It's not that they are doing it to own the libs, it's that they are doing it because they have to do it to be part of the club, style of thing.

  • -14

While I agree with you at every point and in spirt; so much so that I though the guy was room temperature IQ incompetent before he even ran; you sound drunk. I know I am mildly enhanced at the moment. Good post though, maybe just not as a top level in this particular thread.

  • -13

Sure you can. It's just called the Club. It's just based on economic class rather than race; but anyone in the club is HwHite by association. The poor whites (the trash ones, that is. Everyone with less than 10 million dollars) are supposed to act as foot soldiers for their betters and not get uppity.

If you want a group basic on your racial identity and only your racial identity, you can found one. It's be pretty incoherent though, because if you are allowed in I am also allowed in, and I am a communist and also probably not actually the same race as you. eg, the Mut category isn't a recognized breed.

  • -12

This seems like a stretch.

This is like some lefty organization finding the secretary of Blackrocks's marketing division's cto and videotaping them saying "We plan to put all the non straight white men in concentration camps by 2024"; and all the outgroup saying "See! We knew it all along!"

I'm coming for woodworking too, you son-of-a-bitch.

I'm already the guy who swoops in at the last second to bid one dollar more on that #8 jointer; the next step is transing you chisels and redoing you benchtop as a laminated rainbow.

(this is a joke, by the way. I can't really make an effort comment here without it being a personal attack so I'm not really sure what to do vis. conveying that I don't like it)

Wherever I want. I personally boycott nestle products on account of the slaves and the death squads; but that is vanity.

Ethical consumption is impossible under capitalism.

No, a malnourished psychotic is closer to a force of nature. No inhibitions.

Hollywood has lied to you. Inhibitions don't mean shit against 90 lbs and a full caloric load.

Meth, on the other hand...

Your kids will be more liberal than you, and their kids will be more liberal than them, and there is nothing you can do about it.

Sucks to suck, if guess.

I'm talking about Trump, although what I said could apply to either really, and speaking clearly takes all the fun out of it!

Yes, because fuck neo classical architecture. It sucks now and it sucked then.

We have a bunch of home grown styles that are better anyway; eg frank furnace and such. There is no need to make everything an austere roman larp.

Piracy is ethical in the same way that shoplifting is ethical.

Ie: it isn't. It is stealing plain and simple. There is no ethical justification for piracy, including yours. If you don't like the politics behind a product, simply don't consume it or accept that there is no ethical consumption under capitalism.

But! You could consider a certain rate of shrink to be a part of the market and write it off.

There are more people that want products than there are people that can afford products, and there are (sometimes!) more products produced than people that can afford to buy them. If that percentage cancels itself out to zero, it is a legit victimless crime.

Once piracy starts cutting into the share of shit that would ACTUALLY get sold, is when there is a problem.

How so?

I mean, shit; one case took them from being one of the top acts in their genre to not existing. Complete total nuked out of existance level. Not even Kanye got his shit rocked that hard.

At least there exists good rap; good rap is theoretical possible. The design specifications of rap allow for good.

The essential element of stadium country is that it is vapid garbage for people that hate music. It is mid 2000's R&B level worthless trash.

Here are the things that are good about pop country: You can dance to it.

It's the Mcdonald's of music. Bland, overproduced, overpriced, and super salty all the time.

Wait, hold on, I have more bitching in me! And it's deffo not all sour grapes that my guys never break into the mainstream!

A lot of antisemitism as defined is very close to just telling facts. Jews really do have a disproportionate amount of power in key institutions.

Ah, Critical race theory!

I'm glad to find another adherent on this sub, most people are super against it here.

Less snarkily, your points are all valid only through the racialized, critical framing that produced the document you are arguing against.

If you are a white nationalist or black hebrew isrialite or some other flavor of such you are acting 100% consistent, otherwise I think you should do some intellectual hygiene regarding prevailing theories accepted without critical analysis.

I mean, yes, but theft was defacto fine up until the birth of the modern state, because you could just roll into town and kill whoever you wanted, enslave the rest, take there shit to birke or wherever and sell it then go back home to be raided yourself.

The thing that makes a crime a crime in practice is not the law, it is the certainty of consequences.

Edit: Also I AM a socialist, I'm arguing devils advocate/ what is rational in the current model.

Given that about 1,600,000 people in the US are trans and there are various legal standards that rely on gender rather than sex; we do need to define this shit.

If a support only fails under load greater than X where X is a possible load 1/250 times; that shit needs to be fixed.

No. Prices will never fall, wages will never grow (without changing the capitialist millue we all live in.)

If you work for wages you are a sucker; if your portfolio can be damaged by one stock falling you are a sucker.

Quit trying to make money by taking risks or making things and start renting shit as quick as you can; become the parasite before you are infested.

As a lefty: It is a real shooting fish in a barrel type exercise, but it works 95% to score cheap points.

If I get into a "Heated Exchange In The Free Market Of Ideas" and my interlocuter says "woke" or "pronouns" or any other conservative buzz word outside of a conservative safe space, I can make them look real stupid by forcing the conversation to a screeching halt and having them explain it to me.

Either they try in good faith and look stupid, or they blow right through and look disingenuous.

No, because "White Patriarchy" refers to two different ideas: One is that there is a secret masonic lodge of old white dudes who wear red robes and sacrifice a BIPOC virgin every full moon to anoint themselves in the blood of the innocent as they secretly control everything, man!

And the second "White Patriarchy" is noticing that white men hold something like 65-70% of all US political offices, but constitute 30% of the population.

One of these is empiricism, one is insanity.

Qanon is just insanity.

I think you believe this because of the people around you and the bubble you are in; but it just isn't true. Historically when money is tight, SJW's make even faster, harder, more permanent progress. Prosperity produces empty gestures because everybody can get by well enough, hardship produces actual clicks of the ratchet because people have enough potential energy to be actualized into political will.

But even if that doesn't happen, nothing ever happens for you. Even if nobody believes in DEI (which they don't because it's dumb); the gesture is all that is required. If DEI goes away, it will be replaced with something you hate equally because, again, you can't win permanent victories, just like you can't make water flow up hill.

You can expend cultural capital; you can burn that shit as fuel and pump that shit back up; but eventually water finds it's way to the sea.

Because we live under capitalist realism, because even with two (do I hear three!) wars going on right now, History has Ended. Nothing Ever Happens. If you want to actually see the changes you desire in your heart, you are going to need to take a risk; to smash the system just like I will to see the economic changes I want to see.

Once one side picks up a weapon, the other side HAS to pick up that weapon also; and once everyone has weapons in hand being the first one to put them down is hard.

For every Benghazi there will be a Mueller report.

(although, to be fair, those buttery males were indeed buttery and there were some confessions and arrests connected to the Russia gate investigation; it wasn't all flimflamery)