@DenpaEnthusiast's banner p

DenpaEnthusiast


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 04 20:01:58 UTC

				

User ID: 131

DenpaEnthusiast


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 04 20:01:58 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 131

In my experience, you really need to hold the AI's hand to get it to do anything remotely complicated. It's awful at designing things, and will constantly make incorrect assumptions. Last week I had it tell me that some map was wrong because it was keyed off of type information, and so if two types have the same layout there will be a collision. Not only is that not true in C++, I can't think of any language that does that.

That being said, it can be useful when doing things that can be automatically checked. I've had decent success getting it to write mock implementations for tests after denying it the ability to change the actual source code, or to change which libraries the test links. It'll still try to do both of those things, but will eventually give up and write the actual mock. It's also okay at writing the test case outlines, albeit with as few assertions as possible. It's probably still faster for me to add them afterwards than write the whole test by hand.

According to https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40841398/ the average number of children that a US mother will have declined sharply in the 60s and 70s, but has been rising fairly steadily since 1980. The big driver of decreasing TFR is the childlessness rate, which was less than 1/20 in 1960 but is now more than 1/3.

Yes, if the sheriff is actively lying to the judge and fabricating evidence it's not reasonable to blame the judge, but I still expect them to look at the details of the exhibits, not just check that they exist.