Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
No bio...
User ID: 3132
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
1mo ago
The problem was people getting canceled for saying true things or for semi-private jokes, while lots of people were saying horrible anti-white things or pro-riot things with giant megaphones and not facing any consequences.
Yes, cancellation is excellent praxis within an illiberal milieu, but I can't blame anyone for mourning the death of the liberal détente that prohibited it.
I always felt that the NY Times should have canceled Sarah Jeong for her gratuitous anti-white statements, but kept on Razib Khan for his smart and truthful analysis.
Of course, from the NYT's perspective Razib's "smart and truthful analysis" amounts to justification of horrible anti-black sentiment. On one hand, they're correct; on the other hand, he's correct.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
1mo ago
I know you consider the woke to be your enemies, but who is not your enemy? Rather, what are the most leftist ideas that you consider tolerable?
I ask because you use the bioleninist framing to describe the woke. Under that frame, the woke cannot simply "go back in the closet", as their cause approximates a fight for survival. It is foolish to think that the entire lumpen-PMC will meekly accept the dismantling of their HR departments and the devaluation of their degrees, let alone to think that their foot-soldiers will go along with the revocation of their gibs and incarceration of their brethren; the spiteful mutants will not go quietly.
Of course, the above is only predictive insofar as the bioleninist framing is true. Perhaps the black bloc can be persuaded to police their own, perhaps the LGBT can be encouraged to shut down the bathhouses and keep to themselves. I just want to make the point that the desire for griller peace cannot co-exist with the dissident-right framings that you gesture at.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
1mo ago
· Edited 1mo ago
How well would you say that take has aged?
Pretty well actually, the "blond beast" and "Aryan noble" conceptions are perfectly compatible; martial virtue vs. base savagery. I know that this is mere setup for your true thesis, but so far you're definitely not beating the allegations.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
1mo ago
· Edited 1mo ago
Yes, I was talking about blacks re. "homegrown minorities", but some fraction of mestizos are definitely "homegrown" in the same way, at least in Texas and California.
No leniency or accommodation for at least twenty years, if not 60 to match the duration of replacement.
Why not forever? What will have changed by then to merit any tolerance of foreigners, if their presence is so noxious now?
it didnt make one whit of difference to you
You clearly care about this matter on a visceral level. I don't. So it is.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
1mo ago
I didn't bother to check the numbers before 2020, mea culpa. I'll grant you the broader narrative of massive demographic change, though I'll note that until recently the increase in the non-white population seems to have come mostly from homegrown minorities and not imported migrants (so not "foreigners" per se); I suppose that to you the difference is moot. I still don't think that the recent Korean influx specifically was that big a deal, since there's a proximal reason for them to be here and East Asians aren't particularly known for chain-migration.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
1mo ago
Are they really?
In the 2020 census data, Pooler had a population of 25,711, of which Asians made up 6%. Going off the numbers in your excerpt, the Asian population is now up to about 14%; a large increase for sure, but still a minority. Assuming none of the recent arrivals are white, the white population has declined from 54% in 2020 to 45% in 2025, hardly what I'd consider replacement-level demographic change even in the worst-case scenario. This isn't to say that the locals aren't entitled to have their own opinions on their community demographics, or that it could become true demographic replacement in the future, but your assertion here seems mostly baseless.
Also come on, changing one's name is absolutely evidence of assimilation, not perfect evidence nor sufficient evidence, but evidence nonetheless. It sounds like you've taken the Arctotherium-pill writ Asian migration, and while I can't contest the raw stats he highlights I'm still skeptical of the strength of his claims. (Honestly, I don't trust him in general, he comes off as much more cunning and calculated in his rhetoric than other HBDers, who mostly seem quite genuine.)
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
1mo ago
This post shows up as "deleted by user" and is not visible on the front page, btw.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
1mo ago
I don't think she's commenting on some averaged measure of QoL, or at least it's not the true substrate of her objection.
Throughout this post and the last, you've described the increased evolutionary pressure males have gone through to secure mates, in the process honing their intellects, physical skills, and cooperative acumen. Meanwhile, the females' dependence on the males has given them little incentive to develop their physical or mental constitutions, and what pressures they are subjected to is directed towards making them even more pathetic (to use your term) in a zero-sum struggle for male providence. From the picture you're painting, it's not hard to conclude that the masculine condition is fundamentally nobler, closer to the Imago Dei, than the feminine condition. Like with how you describe women's evolutionarily adaptive tendency to embrace their conquerors, the thought of such perfidy being engrained into the female psyche naturally lowers one's perception of them as a group and might justifiably invoke self-loathing of the type exhibited above.
Actually, this reminds me of something. I'm working on (for a very loose definition of "working") a post detailing my thoughts on the psychosocial consequences of HBD on the members of genetically disadvantaged races (spoiler: pretty devastating), and why the usual refrain of "you're [one of the good ones], why do you care?" is utterly ignorant. Your use of the terms "genetically inferior/superior" suggests that your thoughts on this matter might be more similar to mine than the median Mottizen, so I think you're better primed than most to empathize with HereAndGone's lament.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
2mo ago
Even if I want funding to these universities to be cut, I still don’t want some PhD student, writing their thesis on the inescapable legacy of white male oppression or whatever, to be unable to find a job, or to be unable to be treated for disease.
Why? Why is this belief more justifiable in your eyes than the notion that turnabout is fair play, or that the woke memeplex is an existential threat that must be suppressed by any means necessary, or that it's just funny to watch libs cry?
I largely oppose the above notions, but they are clearly memetically superior - more attractive, more consistent, more vital - than the desire for (")neutrality(") that still lives on in the vestiges of the liberal right. I sympathize with your view, but I'd bet that there will be no graceful ending to this conflict.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
2mo ago
· Edited 2mo ago
Has the Trump administration/MAGA at large explicitly denied the possibility of further punishment? Restrictions on left-wing speech are completely aligned with the illiberal right-wing vector, they'd be stupid not to. The question is whether the right's ascendance is complete enough to allow it; the general opinion ITT seems to be that it is not, but we shall see.
Edit: This post quite nicely sums up the actual opinion/driving animus of the new right. Prediction: the final vote count will end up around +20/-10.
Edit 2: Vote count as of Aug 21 2025, 22:11 UTC: +19/-5. Even less pushback than I expected.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
2mo ago
Would you then contest the assertion that women are fundamentally lesser than men? I think that @To_Mandalay is essentially correct in this thread about how women have always been considered lower on the Great Chain of Being than men, do you disagree?
I don't hate women at all, though I do empathize with women who seem to hate themselves like this poor soul. It seems perfectly reasonable to me for women to feel trapped by their biology, to despair that their ordained purpose is mere continuance of the species while the men drive forwards the transcendence of Man.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
2mo ago
I have indeed done some pondering on the origins of femininity. I think my strongest hypothesis is that female neuroticism largely stems from the zero-sum nature of female intrasexual competition, with utility in childrearing being a highly secondary cause. Agreeableness and consensus-seeking seem to me as less of a socially useful trait and more an adaptation towards self-preservation around potentially hostile men. Others have argued for the social utility of women's agreeableness, but I'm still pretty sure that nothing particularly bad would happen if the agreeableness distribution among women was shifted, say, 30% of the way towards the male distribution.
I largely accept the axiom that the world would be a better place if women acted more like men, though I'm unsure of the optimal delta. There are legitimately complimentary aspects to femininity, but to the extent that women are in fact "like narcissistic children", it would be better if they weren't.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
2mo ago
Not quite: it’s in reference to the spit-shined appearance of a well-fellated penis, similar to a glazed donut.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
2mo ago
· Edited 2mo ago
This is true, but it begs the question. Yes, men and women have different foibles, but how do they compare? How do the standards for men stack up against the standards for women?
As WhiningCoil expresses above, the redpill perspective on women essentially considers them as men's lessers, baser creatures driven primarily by instinct. This is a perspective with strong cultural precedent, and its echoes persist to this day, even in aspirationally egalitarian societies. When feminists keep talking about wanting men and women to be equal, despite their equality before the law and the outright preference shown towards women by our cultural institutions, this is what they mean.
In this way, I'm sympathetic to both feminism and the redpill perspective; I do believe that women are to some extent more childish, instinctual, etc. than men, but I also think that this is a highly unfortunate reality, not something to celebrate or appreciate, and hopefully might be ameliorated by whatever means necessary, social or biological.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
2mo ago
Well, the lipostat theory would suggest that the obese already suffer from disrupted homeostasis via leptin resistance. Under that paradigm, GLP-1s are more akin to insulin for diabetics than more tolerance-building substances.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
2mo ago
· Edited 2mo ago
Re. hanging, I did a deep dive into the biomechanics of hanging on a morbid curiosity kick a while back. My conclusion was that (to not put too fine a point to it) it's possible to set things up such that only a relatively painless blood choke is applied and conciousness is lost in 8-10 seconds, but the standard method of hanging puts much more pressure on the trachea and inconsistent pressure on the carotid arteries, causing a far more painful and likely drawn-out death.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
2mo ago
“Let’s see Paul Allen’s cock.”
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
2mo ago
· Edited 2mo ago
I mostly agree with you here, but I'm not sure about a "preference for dependence". I definitely think that there's something of a provider instinct in men (the proximate cause of findom fetishes and general simpery in its maladjusted forms), but I don't know if it generalizes to an outright preference for incapacity. It certainly doesn't seem like men get the ick from women who are functional and capable as independent adults, and I'll say that men who do recoil in this way are indeed possessed of a pathological mindset/ideology. Caveat: this may not apply if the woman is significantly and obviously better than him at more masculine-coded tasks.
Also, younger women are not necessarily more fertile when you're talking about teenagers. I can't find the source ATM, but I've seen data showing that 14-year old girls are about as fertile as women in their late 20's, with peak fertility being reached at 19 or 20 and then declining linearly from there.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
2mo ago
· Edited 2mo ago
It's not a death blow to the redpill or anything, but the article does dispel maximalist claims that redpill types tend to imply about the reciprocity of men and women's attitudes towards each other (e.g. "women desire dominant men who are their social superiors, thus masculine men reject uppity girlbosses for submissive women who know their place"). In truth, women have a much stronger preference for dominance than men have for submissiveness. (source)
More generally, redpillers/antifeminists tend to have a myopic focus on the utility of a woman within the "trad" marriage script (cooking/cleaning/birthing/boning), to the exclusion of more general or "unfeminine" traits/considerations that might be desirable in a wife[1]. It won't make your dick hard to know that your wife has an MBA, but an intelligent and educated woman has far more potential as a proper life partner than a meek and servile tradwife.
[1] See Primaprimaprima below for further commentary in this direction.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
2mo ago
· Edited 2mo ago
I’m curious, if you were to estimate the level of care you owe to the following people on a scale of 10 (as a brother) to -10 (omnicidal maniac), what would it be? (assuming you’re a white American)
-
Another white American
-
A white European living in Europe
-
A Hispanic mestizo legally living in the US
-
A Hispanic mestizo living in Mexico
-
An Ethiopian Christian
-
A Saudi Muslim
-
A black American who has been convicted of two counts of petty vandalism and one count of shoplifting
-
A white American who has been convicted of three counts of felony assault and one count of attempted murder
-
A Simbari tribesman who practices traditional pederasty rites
-
A black American pedophile with a preference for young white boys
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
3mo ago
C'mon Turok, I like tolerate you, but you gotta stop making yourself such an easy target. It's a bad look to start your post with "some rando on Twitter said something", you could have easily made the point yourself.
Anyways, I'm pretty sure that people believing and spreading factually false things is an unsolvable problem, certainly with the existence of the internet. While I am regularly dismayed by the selective gullibility/incredulousness of the twitterati, it probably can't be helped at any sort of scale, and the sort of public concessions that you seem to seek would probably backfire and result in further ideological entrenchment. You can call out that attitude where it happens here, but don't just complain to us about wrong and stupid everyone else is.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
3mo ago
I got sniped by your edit, RIP. To respond, you seem to think of the “weak but strong” mindset as recognizing the enemy’s strength but thinking oneself still capable of taking them on. This is, indeed, a healthy mindset to have towards one’s adversaries. As I tend to see it in practice though, it’s a cognitive trap that does improve morale, but usually does so at the cost of epistemic clarity(e.g. “Republikkkans are literal fascists, we can surely defeat them with protests and slogans!)
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
3mo ago
· Edited 3mo ago
> it’s a common narrative and, one step further, it’s a good and healthy narrative.
As for truth, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle is a fascinating concept, but people can and do come to definitive conclusions about the world all the time. Are the #resist libs correct in assuming themselves the underdogs?
You’re not shadowbanned, it’s just the new user filter. Until you’ve reached a certain karma threshold, all your posts have to be approved by a mod.
More options
Context Copy link