Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
No bio...
User ID: 3132
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
7d ago
· Edited 7d ago
I agree, but that leads us to the next question: do Muslims deserve to be bullied? That is, is the humiliation/ostracization of Muslims in Western societies an effective means towards generally desirable outcomes? (For the record, I think so, but preferably in a more limited sense.)
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
22d ago
I strongly wish I had a copy of that meme where some Twitter wag points out that when humanity invented the wheel, we imagined the universe as a wheel, when we invented clocks, the universe became one of clockwork, and when we invented computation, the universe became increasingly interpreted as one of computation.
Found it in video form.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
23d ago
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
23d ago
Men overwhelmingly make the first sexual move (and then make 3-5 moves for every 1 his female partner makes). This roughly 4:1 sexual dance is preferred by the overwhelming majority of men and women.
I think it's moreso a compromise rather than a mutual preference. I feel like most men would ideally want something like a 1:1-2:1 ratio (and with bigger tits) and most women would ideally want something more, ah, romance novel-esque (though only with the most desirable men, of course).
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
23d ago
Israeli meddling may be its own thing, but I'm skeptical of conspiratorial accusations against the Jewish presence in globohomo/woke/$CURRENT_THING-ism. After all, PMC Whites aren't particularly known for their opposition to woke; I suspect that the overrepresentation of Jews in general wokery is primarily a function of their increased presence in the PMC and not reflective of a distinctly Jewish bent towards leftist progressivsim. If you had data showing jews to be significantly more woke than status-matched whites, that would be more convincing.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
23d ago
· Edited 23d ago
You said that "the Torah says it's ok to rape boys under the age of 9". This reads to me like autistic legalist interpretation on precisely how the laws around equal punishment for sexual offenses and minimum age for criminal culpability interact, not an endorsement of pedophilia; it's no more sinister than an Aella poll.
Semi-relatedly, here's a funny bit from Sanhedrin 55a on the halakhaic status of putting your dick in your own ass:
Rav Aḥadevoi bar Ami asked Rav Sheshet: With regard to one who performs the initial stage of homosexual intercourse on himself, what is the halakha? Is he liable for homosexual intercourse? Rav Sheshet said to him: You disgust me with your question; such an act is not possible.
Rav Ashi said: What is your dilemma? With regard to doing so with an erect penis, you cannot find such a case. You can find it only when one performs this act of intercourse with a flaccid penis. And the halakha is subject to a dispute: According to the one who says that a man who engages in intercourse with a flaccid penis, with one of those with whom relations are forbidden, is exempt, as that is not considered intercourse, here too, when one does so to himself, he is exempt. And according to the one who says that he is liable, he is rendered liable here for transgressing two prohibitions according to Rabbi Yishmael; he is rendered liable for engaging in homosexual intercourse actively, and he is rendered liable for engaging in homosexual intercourse passively.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
26d ago
· Edited 26d ago
Any value that humanity has above other animals is completely dependent on motherhood, and is therefore subordinate to it.
This, of course, is why garbage men and truck drivers are among the most admired and desirable professions.
If we're the same, but women fail to reach the same heights as men, that has far harsher implications than if we're different, and have different strengths.
The point is that, from a bioessentialist framework, the female role requires little to no particular strength of character. Pregnancy is a completely automatic process, caring for babies may be arduous but is not particularly skilled work, and if you believe the hereditarians, the actual raising of children has little effect on how they turn out. Additionally, none of the above tasks is particularly suited to cooperative effort, stunting the potential for camaraderie; as the saying goes, nine women can't make a baby in one month. Thus, if woman's sole or primary duty is to fulfill the female biological role, she will be naturally baser and ignobler than the men she pairs with, who must cultivate virtue in themselves to become capable protectors and providers.
The question, then, is how much impact has this lack of incentive for virtue had on the evolutionary development (or lack thereof) of the female mind. While I personally believe that ingrained differences in potential for virtue between men and women are relatively minimal, what differences exist are surely exaggerated by restrictive norms surrounding women's options for societal contribution.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
27d ago
If womanhood is synonymous with femaleness (that is, performing the biological role of the female sex), then woman has no more claim to dignity (that is, the natural sense which leads us to value man over animal and noble over savage) than any other mammal.
Oh no, not a barely-out-of-the-bronze-age pagan!
If you would prefer an abrahamic source:
[…] who has created me a human and not beast, a man and not a woman, an Israelite and not a gentile, circumcised and not uncircumcised, free and not slave.”
- fragment of a prayer, Cairo Geniza
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
27d ago
Assuming you mean actual William Shockley style "color coded by nature" scientific racism and aren't just smearing around slurs towards anyone who believes in HBD.
As I understand it, William Shockley was his era's equivalent of modern HBD wonks, being consistently polite and sufficiently apologetic with his message. He was probably coarser with his exact phrasings than you could get away with now, but he was still closer to Charles Murray than William Luther Pierce.
Not that it really matters how polite you are, anyways. "[Your race] intrinsically sucks" is never going to be a popular message, and I'm always bemused by people who appear to think that the normalization of HBD isn't RaHoWa-complete.
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
27d ago
· Edited 27d ago
If we flinch away from the idea, it is because we realize that such norms are incompatible with dignity of womanhood. If woman's sole appropriate domain is the bearing and raising of children, then Schopenhauer and Thales are substantially correct:
Because women in truth exist entirely for the propagation of the race, and their destiny ends here, they live more for the species than for the individual, and in their hearts take the affairs of the species more seriously than those of the individual. This gives to their whole being and character a certain frivolousness, and altogether a certain tendency which is fundamentally different from that of man; and this it is which develops that discord in married life which is so prevalent and almost the normal state.
[...]
It is only the man whose intellect is clouded by his sexual instinct that could give that stunted, narrow-shouldered, broad-hipped, and short-legged race the name of the fair sex; for the entire beauty of the sex is based on this instinct. One would be more justified in calling them the unaesthetic sex than the beautiful. Neither for music, nor for poetry, nor for fine art have they any real or true sense and susceptibility, and it is mere mockery on their part, in their desire to please, if they affect any such thing.
- Arthur Schopenhauer, On Women
There are three attributes for which I am grateful to Fortune: that I was born, first, human and not animal; second, man and not woman; and third, Greek and not barbarian.
- Thales
Eupraxia
Of all words spoken, all things read / most true was that which went unsaid
27d ago
· Edited 27d ago
People in third world countries don’t have time for [gender equality], so they get real logical and strait laced about the correct attitudes much easier when their daily bread and way of life is under threat.
Do those people believe that men and women are "spiritually and morally equal before God in dignity and respect"? (Quote from the pre-edit version of the above comment)
You really should be. No Edict of Expulsion ever included an "except the good ones" clause, and even if it did it's unlikely you'd be treated nearly as well as you are now.
I see this phenomenon in dissident spaces a lot, where non-whites underestimate the threat that HBD/racialism actually poses to them personally. There's this deflection away from taking it too seriously, in the mold of "they don't care where you're from as long as you're racist", but at a certain point, you have to assume that people actually mean what they say. If you don't believe present rhetoric is particularly worrying, you can also extrapolate beyond the current horizon; personally, if Total Chud Victory is to pass, I'd put 40-50% probability on turnabout becoming fair play, in the "Make India Aryan Again" sense.
More options
Context Copy link