@Evinceo's banner p

Evinceo

Resident Normie

1 follower   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 04 22:40:19 UTC

				

User ID: 224

Evinceo

Resident Normie

1 follower   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 04 22:40:19 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 224

You'd need to disclose not only your training set, and model, but also the training environment and initial configuration

Done and done.

That's an interestingly roundabout way of mass-banning

I'm ok with this.

a lot of people are just going to smuggle AI-gen outputs as 'naturally'-generated.

Which is going to happen anyway, in fact it already is happening.

Right the only way to make this work would be nothing up your sleeve training-wise. You'd provide your training set and if your model can't replicate, bam, you're busted.

One guy obsessively following Musk around is a stalker. Elon having a meltdown about it... that's news.

Regardless of if it's actually onerous, observe that because many people drive the limitations would be obviously onerous. There's less of an explanatory hurdle.

Maybe it's a circumcision thing too, if you're uncut you require no lube and can get real far focusing pressure on the frenulum.

He appointed an unprecedented three SCOTUS judges in a single term

That's congress's doing, not Trump's. All he did was sit in the chair. Any old stooge could have done that, and for less!

I don't see a lot of Che/Stalin/Mao usernames around here either.

I think the idea is that the Holocaust has permanently tainted Nazi ideology in anglosphere eyes.

None of what you said will stop folks from trying, and some poor mutants who had no say in the matter will live with the consequences.

NYT:WSJ as MSNBC:fox

In short: Ingroup>outgroup?

Alex Jones could have been Alex Jones and made up a different lie that didn't implicate random strangers as adversaries in some grand conspiracy. For example, he could have said that Adam Lanza was CIA.

the other thousand instances that happen every day get ignored or even celebrated

Many many cases go to court every day, so I'm not sure what you're saying here. Jones clowned in court, and if you do that, all bets are off.

I can certainly think of worse instances of abuse and harm than what Alex Jones did. Can't you?

I have difficulty imagining a more ghoulish use of a radio show than to slander the mourning parents of slain children.

Consider the way 9/11 truthers operated. Very few denied that people actually died. I suspect that someone saying 'Cops are liars, none of them died in 9/11, they're just trying to take away our right to brandish box cutters on airlines' they'd be in shit just as deep.

To put things in a different context, if public figures start talking about the inherent evil of a people, and then others start attacking those people in the street at random, do we punish the public figures or the people who committed the crime?

In my ideal world we'd discourage that type of thing, yes. I think that there's a difference between slandering, say 'all white people', 'all black people', 'cops' or 'politicians' and, say, a very specific small group of people ('sandy hook families') and a necessary increase in liability to go with it. If someone says 'Officer Jones is a killer' and someone shoots Officer Jones, it's probably different than if Activist Bob says 'All cops are killers' and someone shoots officer jones. Now, if Activist Bob is the most recognizable cop hater in the whole country, which brings me to:

It seems bizarre to blame Jones as if he was the one phoning these peoples homes, right?

We live in the age of untouchable useful idiots who can be used for plausible deniability. In days past, people were more direct, and law enforcement got good at nailing organized crime. So now we have this: distributed crime with no explicit orders and all relationships are parasocial.

So surveiling the user is trivial (own user's device) and your accountability system relies on end users independently confirming the success of their submissions (possibly using previously owned devices.) Sounds like the only plausible accountability comes from terminally online math enthusiasts who we already don't listen to.

Let me indulge in a bit of repetition here: the right leaning things that will get you kicked off reddit won't get you in trouble with rightwing circles. The left leaning ideas that you aren't allowed to say on reddit you're also not really allowed to say anywhere lefty, so you're dealing with a lot of self-censorship.

NYT probably made the wrong call on doxing Scott, however I think there's a significant difference between an org that makes an occasional mistake versus an org which practices something as a matter of course.

Or: just because NTY doxed one guy does not mean Kiwi's use of doxing knowing full well the level of IRL harassment it tends to invite on its targets is ok.

I suppose it's not just the doxing that makes KF distasteful, but the doxing is a line they could opt not to cross and they'd have a lot more friends.

Any model without an associated public data set is presumed guilty.

Requiring that people hold valid licenses for their entire training sets isn't even enforceable enough to do anything

Why do we think this is unenforceable? Unappetizing because it hits AI hard, sure, but surely not unenforceable.

William Clinton was done in for a blowjob

If he hasn't gone on TV sitting next to his wife and lied about it to the American public he wouldn't have suffered for it as he did.

Nationwide riots errupted due to a drug using felon

... getting murdered slowly in front of a camera.

Seeing a pattern here?

Finally, I realized that my primary aversion to the hyper-woke was their poor arguments and dogmatic attitude. This aversion also explains my dislike of other political groups that express similar characteristics.

The realization that even if one side is right and one side is wrong, no side has a monopoly on bad takes or bad arguments.

I rarely see people on the right introspect about the right this way though, which I find fascinating. Maybe the lefty identity is so tied up with being intellectual or being correct that we can't abide a useful idiot, even if it means arguing against our own team, the old left wing circular firing squad...

Those are only obviously onerous because most Americans rely on cars though.

Rockets almost never launch humans into space. Does that imply that humans being launched into space isn't caused by rockets?

demanding the matter be investigated further

Was this the first time he was bagged, though, or the second?

Does 'investigate the matter further' mean trying to find the next dropped ball or chasing ghosts?

Same thing with Epstein's supposed suicide

Ok that one might be a real hit.

Conspiracy: Do nothing, because if they have the power to let Epstein run rampant, surely you stand no chance.

Incompetence: You demand competence. You watch the Netflix documentary (no coverup here) and you look at your local politics to see if they're mishandling any cases similarly.

You see a pothole in the road. If you believe that the government has left it there intentionally to punish your community because it's too white, you're unlikely to call 411. If you believe it's because the public works department just didn't know about it because they're mortal, you call 411.

That's a conveniently comforting belief.

I read a decent primer on making zipguns (the name for what you're talking about) a while back. Takes some skill to make a weapon that isn't going to blow your hand off but it's definitely not rocket science. Sufficiently motivated people do it; Shinzo Abe was recently assassinated with a zipgun.

I'd take a zipgun made of metal over a plastic one any day.