@Felagund's banner p

Felagund


				

				

				
1 follower   follows 17 users  
joined 2023 January 20 00:05:32 UTC
Verified Email

				

User ID: 2112

Felagund


				
				
				

				
1 follower   follows 17 users   joined 2023 January 20 00:05:32 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 2112

Verified Email

You can't use DNA evidence from a place to prove you weren't there, which is what he's trying to do.

I was pretty sad to see that Louisiana v. Callais was delayed. I was looking forward to that.

They actually say intermediate scrutiny, not rational basis, I believe.

I don't have an opinion on end times things at the moment (but thanks for the mention!). Among many of the contemporary reformed, I think amillenialism (we're living in the millenium right now) is the most common view, and is probably what you refer to as the most reserved interpretation, though there do exist postmillenials (especially among the Doug Wilson-adjacent) and premillenials. Dispensationalism is usually seen as beyond the pale, though.

Historically, many in e.g. the 17th century read Romans 11 as talking about a future conversion of ethnic Israel to Christianity, though that's less popular of a reading now.

Maybe if one reads the 10th amendment broadly?

I suppose the real question is about what relation the founders would have intended the common law to have to the state governments, and what would they have considered to lie within their powers.