FtttG
User ID: 1175
FtttG
7hr ago
My boss has wanted me to build a report for him for months, and I haven't been able to figure it out. Yesterday I tried asking ChatGPT, but after iterating on its suggestions for hours, I was no closer. Girlfriend suggesting asking Claude: Claude suggested much the same nonviable solution as ChatGPT, then demanded I pay for the pro version before it would offer me any more help. The nerve.
Today a colleague suggested asking Gemini. The first two solutions it suggested didn't work. The third one worked perfectly.
I am seriously impressed. I had no idea how good Gemini was relative to other LLMs.
FtttG
7hr ago
Seconded doing it in instalments. You can use our comments as feedback when you're compiling a second draft which combines all four into a single post.
FtttG
11hr ago
New year's resolutions check-in:
- To make up for only going to the gym twice the week before, I went to the gym four times last week. Can deadlift 1.8x my bodyweight for 3 reps, squat 1.05x for 6 reps and bench press .85x for 6 reps.
- Have not consumed any pornography since waking up on January 1st.
- Have completed the SQL course.
How goes it, @thejdizzler, @birb_cromble, @falling-star and @Tollund_Man4?
FtttG
1d ago
Completed the fourth draft of my novel on Sunday. It's just shy of 96k words, about 17k shorter than the third draft and, I think, much stronger for it.
FtttG
1d ago
Personally, I hate the Turkey teeth look almost as much as lip filler. People cutting about like they've a mouth full of bathroom tile.
FtttG
2d ago
I don't think genetic profiling is necessary: these women tend to make themselves known via dyed hair and tattoos.
Well we're talking about two different things which are loosely correlated, and I'm basically just summarising an argument I made elsewhere.
When it comes to promiscuity, I think the proportion of women for whom it is a net-positive is very small. Most women will feel sad the morning after a one-night stand. Stigma and internalised slut-shaming may play some role in this, but I'd hazard a guess the same is true even in free love communes.
When it comes to pornography, among circles of friends, it's generally seen as poor form for a woman to directly tell one of her female friends that she isn't very good-looking: deranged yasslighting seems to be the rule rather than the exception. As a consequence of this, many women end up with an inflated perception of how physically attractive they are, and some decide to open an OnlyFans account on that basis: after all, if you're a 10/10 bad bitch, you're sure to make bank. But they're in for a rude awakening when, after a few months, their account is pulling down somewhere near the median of the OnlyFans income distribution, thousands of dollars below the US minimum wage, and potentially for far more hours worked. No matter how much we end the "social stigma" associated with sex work, if a woman joins a platform in which her expected revenue is heavily correlated with her physical attractiveness, and then she doesn't end up making much money, that's bound to be a disheartening experience. (I think this is what @coffee_enjoyer's comment upthread was arguing: that OnlyFans sells woman a fantasy of being able to use their sex appeal to extract money from wealthy men, but most of these women, by virtue of being insufficiently attractive, are being sold a bill of goods.) It will be an even more disheartening experience if the only way she can make ends meet is by appealing to the fetishes of perverts: I can't imagine anyone feels that good about themselves after a long hard day of producing golden shower videos. And we can talk about "ending the stigma" til the cows come home, but short of a nudist colony, every employer will look a little askance at someone (male or female) if they Google their name and the first result is a photo of their rectum.
FtttG
2d ago
There would be nothing problematic about widespread promiscuity and sex work (certainly not about cyberpornography with zero risk of STDs etc.) if it carried no social stigma
Hard disagree. Most men (most "male people", if we're still doing the trans-inclusive thing) see a boost to their self-esteem the morning after a one-night stand, while most women see a decrease to theirs. Claim that this is purely the result of social stigma, internalised misogyny, internalised slut-shaming etc. all you like: from an evolutionary perspective, I don't think it's hard to understand why the sex which does the impregnating would feel good after carrying out the act which is a reliable evolutionary proxy for impregnating, while the sex getting impregnated would feel bad after doing that act without extracting commitment from the impregnater.
FtttG
2d ago
Pretty much what I argued in May last year, expanded to my second-most popular post on Substack. There are a small subset of women for whom sexual promiscuity and a career in pornography will be a net-positive to their quality of life. For the majority, it will be net-negative.
FtttG
2d ago
No. Revenge porn is distributing intimate images or footage of people without their consent. Revenge cucking is a time-honoured ritual for male status jockeying, and legally protected under all applicable laws and statutes.
Counter-example: Eminem's entire career. He wrote songs attacking his mum, his ex-wife and a boy who picked on him in primary school, none of whom ever attempted or aspired to be famous. He's widely considered one of the best rappers of all time.
Finished my third read of Lying for Money yesterday. I've realised that I have a particular fascination with stories about liars and frauds getting found out and exposed. I loved reading the Wikipedia article about Theranos (and have been meaning to watch the miniseries about the company, The Dropout).
Debating what to read next. I was thinking of reading The Mothman Prophecies, but I'm loath to read two works of non-fiction (I suppose I should say, two books which were marketed as non-fiction) back to back. However, none of the novels in my to-read list are really piquing my interest: Hey Zoey? A Canticle for Leibowitz? After Long Silence?
In the end I opted for Jack Kerouac's Tristessa, which I'd forgotten a friend gave to me a few weeks ago.
FtttG
3d ago
Started yet another attempt on XCOM 2 at Commander difficulty with Ironman enabled last night. This afternoon I got a total party kill on a mission and ragequit. In my defense, I think I only had two soldiers left alive.
FtttG
4d ago
I suppose the closest English-language equivalent would be the "right to be forgotten" or the broader category of defamation of character.
FtttG
4d ago
Chuck Norris created giraffes when he hit a horse with an uppercut.
This is such a funny mental image, in addition to being a weirdly Lysenkoist joke.
FtttG
4d ago
I understand the vintage of the term "meme". What I meant was that I don't remember people referring to Chuck Norris facts as an "internet meme" contemporaneously. My recollection is that, at the time, we just called them "internet jokes" or similar.
FtttG
4d ago
I'm done with this. You're a naked, unabashed hypocrite. You think that gender identity, like sex, is an innate trait. And you also believe that people of a particular gender identity should be given special treatment, which implies that people without that gender identity should not receive special treatment. By your own admission, you think we should build a separate prison facility for trans-identified male convicts to protect them from the non-trans-identified male convicts who might want to hurt them. What about vulnerable non-trans-identified men who might be at especial risk of violence in prison? Fuck 'em.
You demand special privileges for people who possess what you believe to be an innate trait, an "accident of birth". And then turn around and smear me as a pervert and racist for demanding special privileges for people possessing a different innate trait. The only difference between us is that the trait I'm talking about is falsifiable and can be trivially checked with a cheek swab test.
You believe that male people who claim to identify as women deserve special protection from male people who claim to identify as men, even though there's no inherent reason we should expect a member of the former group to be less capable of defending himself than a member of the former group. But you believe that female people deserve no special protection from male people, even though a mountain of scientific evidence demonstrates, without ambiguity, that male people are vastly stronger than female people (and also qualitatively different, in that male people can penetratively rape female people, but not vice versa).
I think you just don't care about female people's welfare. Strange that this is a feeling I get so often when debating with trans activists, who are basically just crypto-MRAs.
In what sense is the word "sex" disputed?
You're not replacing the symbol with the substance. You're replacing a common-sense word with a dysphemism that normal people find creepy and alienating. This is a tactic that trans activists have a strange predilection for ("pregnant people", "menstruator", "chestfeeding", "birthing parent"), under the guise of "accuracy" and "inclusion". And trans activists have the nerve to ask why people find them and the way they talk so off-putting.
Chuck Norris dead at the age of 86. RIP.
The reason I'm putting it in the fun thread is that my first exposure to him was via "Chuck Norris facts", an early 2000s internet meme so old that I think it literally predated the term "internet meme". These were outlandish examples of Norris's awesome skills in the cardinal domains of mortal combat, womanising and lovemaking. I think someone even gave me a paperback book compiling the best examples from the website of the same name. Aside from his very brief cameo in Dodgeball, I still have not seen any of Norris's movies or TV shows, nor do I intend to.
My favourite Chuck Norris facts:
- Chuck Norris once went to the Virgin Islands. They are now called the Islands.
- Wilt Chamberlain claims to have had sex with 20,000 women in his life. Chuck Norris calls this a "slow Tuesday".
I'm sure I've asked you this before – are you a chef?
More options
Context Copy link