@Gugabe's banner p

Gugabe


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 05 06:00:04 UTC

				

User ID: 463

Gugabe


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 05 06:00:04 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 463

Bunch of songs came out on the theme of BLM, but then again it's not like there isn't already significant over-representation of that theme amongst popular music anyway.

Hard to really do a protest song for COVID without getting absolutely nuked from orbit by the media.

British productions, AFAIK, get skewed a lot by the 'London is the whole of the UK' attitude you frequently see from the BBC so it's far more representative of the % of London with African backgrounds than any sort of a reasonable breakdown of the whole country. Combine that with imported American idpol and it explains why every historical show is so skewed.

The ending beat of the movie where Wakanda puts resources into fucking Compton after casually ignoring centuries of African issues in Africa is high comedy, though.

I mean my point is that the 'competition' for obscure fetish art really isn't anything great, so the AI's got a lower barrier to entry into the marketplace.

obscure fetishes you find on /d

I mean if you've got a super-obscure fetish it's not like you're commissioning Rembrandt to do the already-available art. In my meandering experience most niche stuff trends towards being low quality anyways, and the inherent... super-specialization of fetish probably goes a long way.

If I'm into pale girls wearing red high heels and a police uniform, the current situation probably means I can get police uniform or red high heels but AI art is gonna let me layer in all the levels of fetish.

Honestly it's kind of concerning seeing how much internet communities have already done for sexual dysfunction and getting overly fetish-focused.

He's already 73 and it's a largely ceremonial role. I'm sure he'll be a bit more outspoken, but can't really see it turning into much in practice.

I'll be fairly surprised if the monarchy survives the decade. Charles nowhere near as endearing/feature of everybody's lives.

Which layer of caretakers? The immediate family are the chief 'victims' from that POV, though it does raise a question of whether paid assistants can be considered to have downsides.

They're doing an ostensibly unpleasant job, but they're getting paid etc.

What ratio of snowclouds to touch-killing is acceptable, though?

Autism cures are a weird subject in my view, since it depends where exactly you sit on the spectrum.

Which of the following needs a cure?

Somebody with severe life-impacting autism who is happy day-to-day as a result of simply not comprehending their condition and having relatively simple needs & wants. Their perceived quality of life might actually drop if 'cured' from a POV of pure day-to-day happiness.

Somebody with largely high-functioning autism who's prone to depressive episodes due to their social difficulties but can nonetheless fundamentally function in society. Probably most people in the Motte with a diagnosis.

Somebody who's a borderline genius savant, who's accomplished great feats in their preferred discipline, but who is nonetheless incapable of functioning in broader society. Your Paul Erdos or whatever.

Especially acknowledging the spectrum is broad and that there's tons of points between these three. My experience of most 'cure autism' groups is that they're focused expressly on reducing the incidence of the first group of people who are totally unfit for society. Meanwhile as somebody in the second group, who comes from a lineage of other people in the second group, it does feel like a peculiar form of erasure. I've been able to parlay the trade-offs from being high-functioning autistic into professional and personal success, and whilst I'd love some sort of 'everything remains the exact same in terms of intellect and skills but suddenly my brain parses social cues intuitively' trade-off, I suspect that wouldn't be the case. Without even getting into the societal level trade-offs of 'alright we've cured autism, but suddenly we're running low on iconoclastic disagreeable genius inventors'.

I can't really remark on Deafness, and I'm sure there'd be similar arguments to be made that whilst Deafness is clearly a disability, there's a certain attachment to the culture of Deafness that exists, but I feel that Autism is fundamentally different since there's more of an associated trade-off than with most conditions.

Gender dysphoric individuals exist, but it's fairly arbitrary how the rest of society chooses to class them. 'There are people who feel that they are a different gender to their birth gender' is factual, everything beyond that is open to interpretation.

I mean NFTs are more in the 'new speculative good that might experience some adoption but probably not but you never know' category compared to the short squeeze cargo cult where it's a fundamental misunderstanding of how the market works. Equivalently dumb things have bubbled as NFTs.

refuge for right-wingers

I mean it kind of inherently is, due to the overton window for most of Reddit being like 90th percentile Left to 40th percentile Left, which also produces a lot of the 'I was kicked out of the Motte for speaking truth to grotty Right Wingers, but can't possibly be wrong since the rest of Reddit agrees with me' dynamics.