Hawaii98
6mo ago
FILTHY FUCKING PORNOGRAPHY
If you’re serious about this, that’s disgusting. If you’re joking about this, that’s also disgusting.
Hawaii98
5mo ago
Fully, entirely, and totally embracing the irony of this response, you're familiar with Golem meme, no? Might be more familiar to some as 'Frankenstein' where the master loses control of the monster.
But the master is still the master. And my master said we could only serve one master. And now I've gone and typed the word so many times it looks and sounds funny.
Hawaii98
5mo ago
Once you notice you do not un-notice
https://www.jta.org/jewniverse/2016/jean-paul-sartre-simone-de-beauvoir-loved-the-jews
Hawaii98
7mo ago
Can we stipulate Wikipedia is not a Nazi-aligned source? And then put aside everything else, to look at this list of leaders from Wikipedia of the German Revolution that introduced the "Weimar degeneracy" -
Rosa Luxemburg
Karl Liebknecht
Kurt Eisner
Clara Zetkin
Paul Levi
Franz Mehring
Leo Jogiches
Wilhelm Pieck
Ernst Toller
Erich Mühsam
Richard Müller
Emil Barth
Gustav Landauer
Eugen Leviné
Max Levien
Rudolf Egelhofer
Karl Radek
Johann Knief
Emil Eichhorn
It did not have "at least as many" ethnic Germans involved. In reality only 1/3rd were gentiles.
Hawaii98
7mo ago
Everything has been getting so much better, for so long now, that asking ‘wait guys why are we all just getting more completely miserable?’ has the magnetic force of a skunk’s ass
Hawaii98
7mo ago
If there is anywhere left on planet earth that this conversation can be had, it's probably here. So I'm going to try. Let's take this as four separate assertions as see how they match up to what I will reluctantly call reality:
Communism mainly hates people for things that they can change about themselves (being rich, being capitalists, being landlords, etc.)
The Tsar could change the fact that he was the Tsar, but not the fact that he was born the Tsaritsyn. Communism did not demand his death because he refused to abdicate. He, and his entire family, including his infant children, had to die because of what they could not change about themselves. Namely, being more intelligent, more attractive, or born in any way with unequal (and from communism's perspective, unearned) advantage.
whereas racism hates people for things they can't change about themselves.
This is a 4-year-old's understanding of racism from sesame street in the 90's (the only time I can speak to as it's the only time I watched (growing up)). You are not in any way shape or form describing the modal "racist." The modal racist hates, for example:
-
Being raised in a country founded or dominated by a race other than their own
-
Experiencing discrimination as a child because of their race
-
Repeated negative exposures to particular behaviors exhibited by subgroups of a race
And I won't bother going on because you (the reader) gets my point. "I hate X because they're X" is an invention of Hollywood.
Also, whereas communists claim to fight for an unprecedented better world
A better world for...whom? Only the very highest climbers, the one in ten thousand factory-worker-to-party-boss types, aren't worse off under communism than before. Because communists openly claim to fight for a world in which people like me and my family are murdered, and our homes and properties are given to people without any capacity or experience for proper care of either.
racists have nothing new to promise because the world has seen plenty of racism before.
When was the last time anyone, in any position of any authority in the West, said something like "we'd expect fewer black people to qualify for xyz, that doesn't automatically mean the qualifications are unfair." Truly, I'm curious. Tom Buchannan was portrayed as a pigheaded racist 100 years ago
Hawaii98
5mo ago
It wasn't, but that's not necessarily something unworthy of consideration.
Hawaii98
5mo ago
Christ wins in the end, the rest I can't say for sure. But 'Jews lose' is not a safe bet. It seems infinitely more likely that Jews get a DEI carve-out than that the Golem succeeds in slandering the Jews as white.
Hawaii98
5mo ago
Yeah I should have said 'virtually' before the word 'all' - but that feels like a pharisaical retort to learning simone de beauvoir was a philosemite
Hawaii98
5mo ago
Yeah that was a poor choice of words. You called that one correctly. The Old Testament is just the Golem taking over again and again. But that doesn't feel like what's going to happen this time and I have a pretty good nose for this kind of thing
Hawaii98
6mo ago
It is not free to create whatever web it pleases. But humans are free to create whatever culture they please.
There is no phrase dismissive enough to properly acknowledge this folly. But. If wishes were fishes we'd all have a fry
Hawaii98
7mo ago
This is a wonderfully pithy explanation. And what you say applies not just to contemporary Western morality, but to American morality from its founding. America was always a forward-looking country - a new society, a better society, a society that smiled on all men in their individual pursuits of happiness
Please consider this response to consist of the shortest acceptable and most polite way to plainly speak my truth of: 'Demonstrably horseshit. You are wrong. I won't go so far as to accuse you of lying but you are clearly pursuing a different agenda than the people you are so radically misrepresenting'
Hawaii98
5mo ago
My bad bro, it was only 337 out of 400. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Feminists_by_ethnicity
Next time I won't say the snack bowl is all poisoned if it's only 84% poison.
Hawaii98
5mo ago
I fundamentally disagree with you, but I like your writing style and the way you presented your argument. Reported for AAQC
Hawaii98
7mo ago
Sure, I'm laundry by hand all the way. For example, I've genuinely come around to thinking that penicillin was a mistake (because its' widespread adoption inadvertently launched a never-ending biological arms race).
But that won't stop a good chunk of people from saying they hate doing laundry already and 'fulfillment' is lame and for tryhards
Hawaii98
7mo ago
Well, that doesn't solve the problem - the emergence of a semi permanent rentier/leisure aristocracy.
How about offering solutions in addition to criticisms?
Hawaii98
7mo ago
Surely what makes it boo outgroup is the failure to contemplate the possibility that said outgroup might have legitimate reasons for doing what they did.
The comment in no way indicated that Democrats were promising positions to black women for illegitimate reasons. Only that they were doing so routinely.
Not to mention that the claim is a caricature of the outgroup's actual stance, since rather obviously the two black women appointed so far have had all the conventional qualifications for the jobs at issue.
We have wildly, radically different views of what qualifies as 'all the conventional qualifications' for the Vice Presidency and Supreme Court. If you're going to assert that Kamala Harris is as conventionally qualified as Mike Pence, Joe Biden, Dick Cheney, Al Gore then you're going to have to provide evidence and you're not going to find any. Mike and Al were governors with actual governing experience. Joe and Dick had 30+ years each of dc insider experience. Hell before he was VP Dick Cheney was WH Chief of Staff and Secretary of Defense.
If you'd like to put Ketanji '379 days on the Court of Appeals' Brown Jackson's record up against the conventional qualifications of, oh I don't know, having an established judicial record for the senate to be able to examine before confirmation, then feel free to do so, but just asserting it to be so has negative probative value.
And, of course, a non-boo outgroup approach might consider that taking representation into account when appointing someone to a representative body does not seem to be unreasonable on its face.
Representation of their constituents political desires. That's what they're supposed to be, at least. You're (likely inadvertently) advocating to replace that system with a South Africa style quota. Which, if enacted, would mean a great many black women would have to be fired and replaced. Because they are currently hilariously overrepresented at all levels of 'public service' given they are around ~6% of the American population.
Hawaii98
4mo ago
I tried like 8 times to write a long one and it all seemed absurd. You're right, I acknowledge your feedback
Hawaii98
5mo ago
There are 10k splinters of Protestantism and Catholicism is a joke. Nobody has a clue if salvation is through faith, good works, or both. It really really matters if you have any concern for our immortal souls. Maybe consider that everybody lost the 30 years war.
Thank you Jesus for the expression 'cart before the horse.' All the feminists were Jews. Jews have been doing all the DEI stuff, quite openly. They can and have openly murdered 10's of thousands of innocent people and the consequences are more protection, more funding, more support, more philosemitism. Like I already said I'd be more than happy to bet on this
More options
Context Copy link