It could also be that when Arjuna was on the battlefront of Kurukshetra, facing his own kin on the other side, and thus began to question his moral duty, it was at this very moment that Lord Krishna lowered his disguise and revealed himself as an incarnation of Vishnu, and lectured him specifically that his dharmic duty was indeed not to back down from the battlefield, but rather to stand and fight, which was in fact a manifestation of his divine duty and even of the selfless love (karma yoga) that he was incarnated to embody, and that Arjuna, upon hearing this and understanding the truth of the eternal nature of existence, took up his bow and began to fight.
My new theory is that self-accepting gays and sexually malformed people become the far left whereas self-denying members of those categories become the far right.
Since Biblical times, true engine of history has been and will remain the queers.
I understand that these may be uncomfortable thoughts to consider.
However, I would just like to reiterate that if anyone is suffering in this way, please come forward privately.
With better data on this phenomenon, we might be able to improve outcomes for a generation of sufferers through evidence based practice.
It’s official. Hitler had a micropenis. Furthermore, Nick Fuentes is either a closeted homosexual or a 30 year old virgin.
I’m wondering to what extent far right political worldviews are influenced by the denial of sexual malformations or shortcomings. I decided that this forum would be a good place to explore the extent of this and perhaps collect more data on the phenomenon.
If any posters here at the motte would like to participate in an anonymous questionnaire, please DM me.
- Prev
- Next

Is it fake and wrong, or is it merely fake and gay?
Who, in the end, is really to say?
More options
Context Copy link