@Karpal's banner p

Karpal


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 04 23:07:44 UTC

				

User ID: 254

Karpal


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 04 23:07:44 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 254

It's not preserving 'the original biological machinery in the original way' that is important, it may be about preserving a process that entails subjective experience.

It feels intuitive to me that the processes of certain kinds of systems feel like something from the perspective of the system and some don't. A purely indexical system (like a thermostat or an optimised 'follow the instructions of the earing' system) seems like the second type. Systems that intuitively don't seem like they'd have subjective experience.

I can't think of any way to test this, but it feels right that for a system to have subjective experience, or would have to:

  • Have more than a single goal or proximal goal
  • Process external and internal data differently
  • Is self-changed by the process

These are true for a person making decisions in life. They aren't true for an optimised 'follow the instructions of the earing' system no matter how accurately the instructions achieve the person's own original goals. I like that greg Egan short too, but I don't think the earing and the 'jewel' are the same because the jewel learns to copy the process of the person's thought, the earing (probably) doesn't.

Just a feeling.

This is a completely rational and a smart way to think and a completely rational and smart thing to say anywhere in the world except in a forum where we agree to deal with each other's arguments as stated and not the nefarious motives we imagine behind the arguments.