Most of the replies in this thread read as LLM output. Is that accurate? If I wanted to talk to the bot you've been working with I'd just throw your doc in GPT.
That aside, your proposed amendments are so full of contradictions a lawyers could drive a bus through them. For example: forbidding race based discrimination and elevating the founding culture/religion - Choose one! If a municipality wanted to ship in 10k patriotic new Brits to replace 10k Somalis you'd probably be happy, and your assimilation amendment forbids that (race based discrimination).
And even if I waved a wand and moved all these objections aside, what would be much more useful than a manifesto would be a simple, several paragraph post on what you want the US to be. Start from first principles: what you'd like, then we can evaluate the efficacy of how you want to get there.
I don't want to drive you off from the Motte, but I don't think this is the way to start a conversation
Edit: Ok I gave you far too much credit. Annexing the anglosphere? This is not a serious set of proposals (capping the IRS employment while building an Empire? Ha!).
At least he is not fully integrated with the slopMatrix yet. There is still hope. Out of curiosity, lets say he made a new account, and started posting in this thread as the author, but with real human TM responses. Would he be banned again automatically for evasion or given a second chance?
More options
Context Copy link