@No_one's banner p

No_one


				

				

				
1 follower   follows 8 users  
joined 2022 September 08 22:22:12 UTC

Underemployed Slav. Likes playing Factorio.

Verified Email

				

User ID: 1042

No_one


				
				
				

				
1 follower   follows 8 users   joined 2022 September 08 22:22:12 UTC

					

Underemployed Slav. Likes playing Factorio.


					

User ID: 1042

Verified Email

Total informational blackout, facial ID systems and military drones are going to make occupations much less painful. If you can conduct head counts, track every single person with with cameras or transponders and run AIs to spot suspicious activity, anomalous food use or insurgent activity, war of conquest gets a lot easier.

Also, the age of hobbyist level drones being militarily useful against China or Chinese friendly states ends 5 years from now, at worst.

Don't worry about Taiwan war.

American magazines of anti-missile interceptors are so low they'd never even get carriers in range to help Taiwan.

The war would be, perhaps, a blockade of Malacca straits and some posturing/cyber warfare etc.

They provided blueprints and a couple thousand, so maybe (gasp) $30,000,000 in crappy drones. That's less than a single jet.

Russians are now making Geran-2 drones wholly on their own.

Israel isn't a NPT member state.

The actual impetus appears to be the stockpile of 60% enriched uranium, but 60% enriched uranium isn't itself a violation of the NPT.

With modern centrifuges that's a few days away from material for efficient uranium bombs.

Aren't Israelis guaranteed to blow up the Kharg island oil terminal and any other terminals if Iran refuses to hand over the uranium?

It's not possible for a MOAP to destroy a facility 100m deep in rock. It's intended to strike bunkers 40m deep in soils.

You would need a lot of successive strikes, possibly with something in between else to remove rubble and allow deeper penetration.

These are not really comparable, method or cohort wise. Postal survey is probably biased towards bored old people..

Also it's strongly suggestive that on the link paper claims length of exposure to finasteride was correlated with the ED..

So it's a show that selects for lolcows and then allows them to humiliate themselves by their unwise actions?

Okay, it might be noting, but here's some keywords you can look up.

https://x.com/hairypapasmurf/status/1935048213842772035

the absolute risk is not so high that you need to run away screaming

You suggest this ED is some sort of lizardman finding and if you examined the health database you'd find 1.5% 15-42 male are getting ED that lasts 5 years even even if they don't use finasteride?

Even if you're in the unlucky 1-2% that gets significant side effects, they usually wear off in weeks or months from cessation.

Papers on that say something completely different.

1.4% (167 men) developed persistent erectile dysfunction lasting a median of 1348 days.

...you didn't hear there's some new molecule that apparently revives dormant hair roots and in tests, bald men grew their hair back?

It's nothing hormonal and doesn't have the dire risk profile of finasteride etc.

Living on the top floor of an apartment building I've come to appreciate heat waves intimately. The building is well insulated and barely needs heating if it's >10°C, but the roof volume is not ventilated at all, so during heat waves, that whole part of the building accumulates heat and temperature in my apartment gets to slightly above shade temperature and barely dips during the night.

I am now wondering if 2 months of slightly uncomfortable temperatures (27-29°C) and, on average, one week of really uncomfortable (32-38°C) are worth installing AC.

Or how much difference ventilating the building roof thoroughly could do. A single 100W fan would exchange all the air in the attic twice in an hour. That should be vastly cheaper than AC and depending on how much it'd cut the need for AC, neighbors might even help with funding that.

Is it unfair to describe Fishtank as a sort of lolcow humiliation show ?

Yeah, skin deep writing. Pretty much. The concepts are fine, but the quests and the unit lore is just .. ugh. Just not to my taste. Almost tempted to rewrite that stuff to be less cringe. Starsector has relatively decent writing that doesn't feel insulting, but that's probably because the game devs are clearly SF readers.

Couple more annoying things: I feel like planes should have fuel / require bases like in SMACX and I just plain dislike titans. Logistically they're just kind of dumb and conceptually don't make that much sense either. And what is even the point where e.g. Praetorians kill various titans without much issue and are air-mobile?

Wonder how hard modding it is.

If roads were cheaper/could be built automatically and supplies were not automatically delivered but depended on accessibility and supply depots/convoys, the game would get a fair amount of depth.

If you could make formations out of units and move them at once, that'd be very good too.

Also, it's nice that each unit has a specific weapon because swapping out those weapons for others same way heroes swap out items would make it much more interesting. I don't get why weapon selection isn't already in the game. Endless Legend had unit builds and it added some depth to the combat..

Nothing revolutionary at all, but it works well enough.

Tbh the combat is a fair bit deeper than in ordinary 4x games, or at least could be with some more options.