@Oopz's banner p

Oopz


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2023 June 02 20:04:50 UTC

				

User ID: 2451

Oopz


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2023 June 02 20:04:50 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 2451

Being Laughed at can cause serious damage to the psyche.

Oh. That's.... Novel. Please do elaborate.

Even for the math/logic heavy departments/universities?

Fair enough. That was a leap in logic.

I'm quite dreamy and high empathy and I want everyone to flourish and I'm the perfect demographic for the CRT stuff in theory. But I'm way more a shape rotator than I am verbally titled and so when I read the CRT stuff it has little/no effect because I can't even grasp the underlying structure. It's like looking at a foreign language. I don't think it's good or bad I literally, physically, actually can't understand it.

You should type in what you just said into any ai app with the sentence " Please do an IQ subtype analysis on the above paragraph."

You have a spiky cognition profile

It seems like your working memory and processing speed might be a little off. Could be ADHD heavily compensated by the rest of your powerful brain.

Apparently your profile would be good as a comedian, a trial lawyer, sales person or academic.

Interestingly enough I think it's those with high verbal tilt who are susceptible to lies and manipulation under specific conditions. The specific conditions being widespread societal belief DEI is a good thing with no tradeoffs and the larger liberal thinking.

Out of all the IQ subtypes, verbal IQ is not necessarily wrapped around truth. It's the ability to move through the realm of words. You can move through the realm of words amazingly but if you don't have the other IQ subtypes that allow you to figure out ground truth then you are at the mercy of those who create your language, media, books, movies, newspapers.

Jordan Peterson is an example. I think his IQ may be high across the board but I think his verbal IQ is off the charts. He's poetic,expansive,complex but he refuses to answer simple questions and sometimes gets tripped up in word games of his own creation. Plus he's chosen the bible as his foundation probably since childhood. So his extremely high verba IQ is contained by this extremely large volume of text the origins and authors and veracity of which we have been arguing about for millennia.

My point wasn't that verbal IQ is a useless or inferior subtype my point is that it has it's limits like all things do.

So it's not about whether or not Arday had high verbal tilt (I would argue its high because it was high enough to get into Cambridge with a little boost from affirmative action, sob story , white guilt and the general current society).

This type of thing is extremely unlikely to happen at MIT or Caltech or any Chinese university simply because admission is based on shutting up and multiplying.

This was always going to happen with DEI implementations.

We need to have an honest conversation about IQ and IQ subtypes and figure out a way to make it palatable to the masses.

Maybe different nomenclature maybe not so numerical (at least to the public).

People who are word/verbally tilted (I think the term wordcel is a degrading) don't really understand the world like shape rotators (also hate using that word) but we still have an obligation to help them as our fellow man.