I remember that Maher joke/statement. He was absolutely on point.
"But the morality they adopted wasn't egalitarian therapy culture with the State as mother, it was woke culture with the State as HR lady."
Good point. You may remember the age of "everyone gets a gold star" or "a trophy just for playing." The turn of the last ten years by progs has been far more discerning about whose esteem should get boosted.
This goes way back. In the 90s I understood the Republicans as the daddy party and the Democrats the mommy party. That notion seems stronger than ever now, though.
As the world shrinks into ruins, this cool detachment becomes harder and harder to sustain.
Gobsmacking hyperbole that unfortunately undermines your reality-based take on social construction and language
This seems far more plausible in the age of "audience capture" facilitated by parasocial media. That was just beginning to percolate in 2011
Taking the high road is how we got here.
We got here because not enough people want to take the low road? And what does the low road look like to you?
I looked into that yesterday and curiously enough most of the RW glee came from a guy being hoisted by his own defund petard, and after having celebrated the death of Rush Limbaugh (among others, iirc)
There is no unity, and there is no both sides.
Well, the idea that there are just two "sides" is also foolish. The conflict and lack of unity is real, and for that reason suggests a multiplicity of sides. You expect fractious human beings to just line up within one of these sides, out of just two sides? What are you assuming here, kumbaya unity?
In the tense spring of 1936, on his way to Madrid University, Juian Marias, a disciple of the philosopher Jose Ortega y Gasset, never forgot the hatred in the expression of a tram-driver at a stop as he watched a beautiful and well-dressed young woman step down onto the pavement. 'We've really had it,' Marias said to himself. 'When Marx has more effect than hormones, there is nothing to be done.'
Very interesting. I look at frustrated Gen Z men and their disdain for licentious hot women and the men who get laid with them and feel something similar. They've overcome the stigma of being what my generation called "a hater" (and the attendant possession of a PhD, or Player Hatin' Degree).
Yea people oscillate between hanging you for who you are/what you do and what you say. Progressives claiming Robinson's upbringing and demographic profile make him actually right-wing e.g.
Al Green, a black Texas Dem that surely screams "woke," said kind things about Kirk. Said they have the same creator up above and that Kirk "had a right to be where he was, and a right to life." But he's old school black religious, likes MLK Jr. The newer school of James Baldwin and post-colonial lefties, not a sentiment you see much.
Right. Men in particular of the Joe Rogan sort liken cancelling to HR ladies OR church ladies. Indeed HR ladies are the next generation of church ladies to them. (Though in the age of Trump perhaps it could be described as HR Ladies vs. DR Ladies.) There's something in fact un-manly about cancellations. Something un-manly about being a pink slip sniper, of being a clipboard-carrying, list-compiling hall monitor.
I guess I feel bad for some on the left now the same way I felt bad for conservatives amid covid, when they were the pariahs
Kirk happened in the age of social media's over-socialization engine, which amplifies everything
Busybody pile-ons full of people feeling giddy at the prospect of ruining someone's life for an opinion is is shameful.
A business owner in Sacramento was just mistaken for a guy in So Cal whose wife talked shit about Kirk. He was getting threats from people running away with ignorant moral righteousness fueled by social media amphetamines. Again, shameful.
The right discovering that they believe liberalism itself is nihilism reminds me of a central Asian Muslim student who attended a classical liberal seminar years back with me. He said it all just sounded like moral relativism to him. (He ended up sleeping with a Marxist woman that night we both were trying to get at, lol, but I digress. Totally principled guy!)
yea that'll work out fine. we can just trust them stop. the best time to stop is always NOW.
"If I find out you ever said X anywhere, and I work with you, then you said X at work."
Well put. The "they started it" angle of attack obscures that we've all "started it" in a messy, volley-like and cross-cutting manner.
"We live in the postliberal Friend-Enemy Schmittian power dynamic and the left is responsible for it."
I'd put the blame more on the development of media and particularly the social media panopticon. But let's assume it's just the left that started it (and not that it hasn't just been a persistent back and forth from both illiberal leftists and rightists for a very long time), for how long does the right get to cancel back before it's the right responsible for it?
Yes, again, we're not doing the same thing. I'd reframe it as, "illiberals have been treating political disagreement as an existential and moral struggle for years..."
We are in a culture war that was started most noticeably because the dominant left culture cancelled, censored, and doxxed nearly every dissenting opinion they could.
Yea, and that was awful. But are they awful because they're doing that or because they're on the left? If your opponents just are people that censor well then you're not even doing the same thing as a conservative at all.
"if we got through the beatifiction of St. Floyd, St.Kirk should be no skin off anyone's nose."
Yes. And if you're on the right you've gotten so used to having a thick skin on this - being asked to worship people you find pretty repellant, and the favor never going the other way - it becomes more difficult to bemoan OR celebrate anyone. It can make cynical and indifferent as much as it can make you hate the left passionately enough to posture and discourse like they do.
But with that said, I have significantly more sympathy for people who celebrate his death than seems to be common among people who don't share that celebratory mood. It doesn't feel outrageous to me that people are enjoying this. Imagine that someone you really hated was randomly struck down by a freak bolt of lightning. Wouldn't you be pretty giddy?
That's the thing though. No, I only really hate people who do things like murder people. I hate the Charlottesville guy e.g.. Otherwise it's just words. Not that I can't see a breaking point even there, if he's going around advocating for pedophilia or instructing terrorists in bomb-making (which of course has a more material component).
I don't know, people not waiting some minimum amount of time to be critical, and doling out "why can't we all get along?" platitudes, just can't be sustained in the attention economy. It's not the people are just so much meaner now.

"There is pressure from Trump, but more importantly..."
More importantly? I'd say secondarily. The more straightforward answer is that they were scared of the FCC: https://x.com/MattZeitlin/status/1968444362754269623
More options
Context Copy link