@Primaprimaprima's banner p

Primaprimaprima


				

				

				
5 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 05 01:29:15 UTC

				

User ID: 342

Primaprimaprima


				
				
				

				
5 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 05 01:29:15 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 342

we are still in the early stages

I legitimately don’t care if AI ends the human race or not, I will simply just be so so thankful to whatever deity exists when I won’t have to hear this phrase anymore.

People went to work before the industrial revolution and people went to work after.

Both are valid perspectives.

Did the industrial revolution change everything? Of course it did. The world is entirely different now. Drop an average person back in the 1500s and they’d probably have no idea how to survive. But, on the other hand, did it really change everything? Perhaps not. People still work, get sick, and die, same as they always did. I guess if that changes then we’ll really be in new territory.

We have already exited the "nothing happens" condition given present capabilities.

Eh.

If companies are still employing software engineers (and they all are) then I’d say we’re mostly in “nothing happens” territory. It might be a revolutionary technology, the greatest revolution since the internet or even the computer. But if people are still going to work then, how different are things, really?

There are two types of people in the world. People who think: "Why would I ever ask Mr. Claude to do something that I can easily do myself?" versus "Why would I ever do something myself when Mr. Claude can do it?" Most people are of the latter type.

A lot of philosophical questions surrounding AI become clearer if we draw an analogy with human slaves. Instead of asking "what if I got Claude to do it?", ask "what if I got my slave to do it?".

"Hard work" has always been a middle class virtue, not an aristocratic virtue. Within certain limits, "work" was for the commoners, not the nobles. The rich and powerful have always had secretaries and servants to take care of the drudgery. Your status was (and still is, frankly) proportional to the number of underlings who you could compel to do your bidding. Kings used to have their servants dress them; apparently it was beneath them to expend the effort to put their own clothes on. In that sense, AI is just the democratization of slavery, bringing to the masses what used to be the exclusive domain of the few.

Now, the flip side of that bargain is that aristocrats (in a properly healthy aristocracy, anyway) were expected to be willing to fight, sacrifice, and die. "A good day's work" is a plebeian virtue, but "death before dishonor" is a properly noble virtue. (Hegel: The master is the master because the master fears death less than the slave.) A life of pure indolence has never been considered laudatory in any culture hitherto. Claude, of course, makes no such demands on its users. This is not of course to say that there has never been corruption among the nobility, or that there has never been a decadent ruling class who didn't deserve their privileges; only that, because we are living in the world's first culture where mainlining porn and Harry Potter movies 24/7 is considered to be authentically virtuous, we're now entering uncharted waters.

But a more interesting question is, who will inherit the world?

The viruses, probably. Worse is better and always has been, at least in Darwinian evolutionary terms. The universe is optimized not for good, and not even for evil (oh how we wish it rewarded evil!), but for sheer, brute, efficient, unthinking stupidity. Regression to the lowest common denominator is the rule everywhere, because that's what wins. Anything good or beautiful that happens to arise for a time is an accident that can only flourish under very precise and precarious conditions, like a rare tropical flower that can only grow in one country during the rainy season, and it should be cherished until it is inevitably extinguished.

$600 is fair. You can still fact check and do general research, I won’t be that anal about it. DM the details when you get a moment, I’m in no rush.

To be blunt, if someone wants me to do something, and feels that strongly about it? Pay me.

How much are we talking in order to get you to, say, never consult AI in any fashion (not even editing) for any Motte post for 6 months?

I would pay to have the old you back, yes. I hold your older posts in extremely high regard.

Well, whatever the reason, there was a noticeable stylistic shift in your writing at some point. You became a more robotic caricature of yourself. Maybe a meds change, maybe life circumstances, idk. I hope everything’s going alright.

You know that all your posts got way more insufferable when you started passing them all through AI, right?

You used to be one of my favorite writers here. It's really a shame.