@SirJohnFalstaff's banner p

SirJohnFalstaff

I'm one of the best from the West, my name still tatted on my ex wife's chest

0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2024 August 02 18:11:46 UTC

Nay, you shall hear, Master Brook, what I have suffered to bring this woman to evil for your good.


				
User ID: 3165


				
				
				

			

		

	














	


		


			



	

		

			

			

				

					

						

							
						

						

							
							

								
SirJohnFalstaff


								

								

								
								
								

								
							
					
 
				


				
I'm one of the best from the West, my name still tatted on my ex wife's chest

				
				
				

				

					0 followers  

					follows 0 users  

					joined 2024 August 02 18:11:46 UTC
				


				
					

					
Nay, you shall hear, Master Brook, what I have suffered to bring this woman to evil for your good.



				

				

				

					

					

					
					
					

					
User ID: 3165


					
					
					
				

			




		

	

 











			
			

			
			

			




	


		

			
‎

			

				
				

					Hour
					Day
					
					Month
					Year
					All
				

			


			
‎

			

	
	

	 Hot Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
	



		

	






	

		
		

		
		
	

	

  







		

			
			
				Small-Scale Question Sunday for November 8, 2026
			
		

	




	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					


There's an old joke in atheist communities that God must have a sick sense of humor to put an amusement park in the middle of two sewage plants, but the flip side is that it probably shouldn't surprise you if you hear arcade sounds while monitoring blackwater PH.




I always heard it as a group of engineers debating what kind of engineer God was. The mechanical engineer pointed to the muscles, the electrical engineer to the nerves, the software engineer to the mind, each claiming that was the real essence of God's creation and that God was one of theirs. Then the municipal engineer said that God must be a municipal engineer, because who else would put a recreation area right next to sewage removal.




And at least some of the response follows, there: receptive men benefit a lot from having a prostate and there's not really many other good places to put it without doing a remodel of the whole front deck; rimming is very much focused around just how sensitive the ring is; women who are into anal sex often particularly enjoy pressure on the vaginal walls and internal clitoral structure coming from a different angle.




Yeah, this is what I'm getting at. It seems to be such a good design to achieve pleasure that it must be evolutionarily advantageous in some way, or it would have been selected against. If pleasurable anal sex was a purely negative evolutionary trait, one would expect there to be hard stops in place to prevent it from being pleasurable to warn you not to do it. Instead, we need a whole series of social taboos going back thousands of years across disparate cultures to prevent people from doing it. As a penetrative male partner, I find the novelty good for a once-in-a-blue-moon trip, but generally find the experience to be more trouble than its worth with the designed substitute right there. But female partners regularly request it, love it, prefer it.




That said, it's also worth pointing out that it also doesn't work for everybody; that's actually some weak evidence against serious broad evolutionary benefit. Even some gay subby guys don't get much out of it, and even for those that do like it, the prep can be more than a little obnoxious.




Women report orgasm from vaginal penetration alone at similar rates to anal penetration. So there's something there. I don't know what's going on with gay men, we seem to have given up on actually explaining what homosexuality is as a society and I find myself increasingly unable to understand what is going on there.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	







		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of November 9, 2026
			
		

	




	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I don't find the audio quality to generally add to the experience, normally it's distracting and disgusting and takes me out of it. Not that I don't enjoy female copulatory vocalization, on my phone I have audio messages that partners recorded for me that I quite enjoy. But normally, when I'm viewing pornography I find that the over-done bad acting of the fake orgasms really turns me off rather than on, and I have no use for most of the scripted additions. I suppose there probably exists porn to my audio tastes, but it's not tagged as such or I never figured out how to find it and I've never dedicated the time to doing so, the tags are typically referring to the visual rather than the audio.


I enjoy the visuals, but typically the voice acting just takes me out of the whole thing, as I realize that I don't actually want to be there doing this with this woman. A silent naked woman I can imagine as my perfect partner, as the smart classmate or colleague of mine, as a vivacious and intelligent young thing that just happens to be a total whore for me. When she starts talking, I realize it's a porn star, doing a porn, and I don't find that all that interesting. Either she lacks believable enthusiasm, or she says stupid or corny things, and I'm just not into it. And I never really want to hear the man say anything, I can't remember that ever adding to my experience.


I'm sure if I dug around I'd find porn made to my specifications, but I don't really dedicate much time to this search and I'm not fluent in porn tags.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	







		

			
			
				Culture War Roundup for the week of November 9, 2026
			
		

	




	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I watch porn with the sound off, typically, in which case step sibling stuff is just porn. In fact, it tends to be the most normal porn you can find: a hot young girl doing sexy things with a normal-ish looking guy.


When I was a youth and went on Literotica, I gravitated towards the "first time" tag because all the other tags were fucking weird. I didn't want werewolves or bdsm or slavery or raceplay, I just wanted two young people having sex. I didn't particularly fetishize the virginity loss portion of it, it just happened to be the one tag on the website where I could be fairly sure nothing bizarre and off putting would happen.


I think the percentage of people who really value the step-sibling thing is one group, but there's another group of consumers that can tolerate it, or who ignore it because they either watch without sound or they skip ahead past the "Oh my God mom and dad aren't home I can't believe you caught me masturbating!" script right to the ol' in-and-out part.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	







		

			
			
				Small-Scale Question Sunday for November 8, 2026
			
		

	




	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
It seems too distinct and common a physical sensation to be entirely accidental.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	







		

			
			
				Small-Scale Question Sunday for November 8, 2026
			
		

	




	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
I agree with your sociological explanation, but I don't think that's a sufficient explanation for the physical sensation of orgasm. Orgasm from pure psychological stimulation is extremely rare.


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	







		

			
			
				Small-Scale Question Sunday for November 8, 2026
			
		

	




	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
Is it?


				

				

						

							

								
							

						


						
					

				
			


			
			
			
				

			
		

	







		

			
			
				Small-Scale Question Sunday for November 8, 2026
			
		

	




	

	

		
			

			

				

			

		

			


				

					
What is the explanation for why anal sex is pleasant?


It seems kind of absurd as an evolutionary matter, and rather silly to say that God made us that way. Inasmuch as it is doable at all, it ought to be fairly useless for the receptive partner, similar to titty-fucking or oral sex: pleasant and perhaps arousing as a mental matter but not physically stimulating or orgasm inducing. But 70% of women report orgasm from receptive anal (20-30% from anal penetration alone, another 40-50% from penetration plus clitoral stimulation), and even more men report orgasm from receptive anal.


This seems like a significant gap between what is intuitive to me, and what is the lived reality out there, and I can't really account for it as either a useful biological tool that would have evolved naturally, or as something an intelligent creator would have inserted (ba dum tish) either intentionally or by accident.