“Jenni Hermoso”
Normative determinism* takes an L. Old and mid, even without the tatuajes feos.
Of course Hermoso, her hanger-ons, and mainstream media will try to over-dramatise and wring every drop of clout, attention, and idpol victimhood as they can out of this. However, I can’t muster up much sympathy for Rubiales either.
Like he couldn’t rein in his thirst for just a bit? With his high status position, he could had banged one of her hotter teammates a few hours later. Or better yet, even hotter unaffiliated chicks.
ESH.
*At least it isn’t “Jenni Hermosa,” which would sound like she could be an all-too-common latina camwhore “modelo de cam”.
Sloot
8mo ago
A confounding factor is that she’s no spring chicken at this point, well on the wrong side of 30.
You’ve also likely seen her engaged in various degrees of hoetry across multiple films, which may have killed any sort of warm feeling you might otherwise have had toward her, potentially even inducing a sense of male ick.
That's fair.
Although I would add, conversely, misogyny (in the strict sense of hating women for being women) can in many cases inspire thinking that women are necessarily boring, useless, and/or weak just because they're women (where "weak" is probably the... weakest... part of the statement, as women are almost always indeed physically weaker than men, and in many cases psychologically, as well).
Sloot
8mo ago
On that note, I've recently moved to the UK so punting doesn't seem like such a bad idea for a date
Instruction unclear; my date got tired and whiny after a few minutes of retrieving the footballs I kicked.
My go-to date is drinks at my place; no need to introduce unnecessary extra steps. Drinks at the pool of my building is always a great option too, location/season/time-of-day permitting. Pool dates are like catnip for chicks, as they are always eager to get photos of themselves in bikinis for social media. “If it involves a bikini, the answer is yes” reads many a girl’s online dating profile.
Plus, them having less clothing on means a smoother experience getting her naked once you’re back in the apartment/hotel room, and thus it leaves less time for her to think and it increases the general feeling of “omg like one thing just led to another and it just like happened!” for her.
One could also smoothly invite yourself over to her place and hope for visitor’s field advantage, if you deem your place insufficiently cool or there are any other obstacles. Their defenses are typically lower when presented with this idea relative to inviting her over to your place. On the other hand, this option might not be practical if she still lives with family. You also might not know if she lives with roommates and to what extent they might cock-block, inadvertently or not, or otherwise ruin the vibe.
Sometimes roommates can be worse cockblocks than parents. Mothers will often be pleasant, offer a quick chat, and then make herself scarce. Fathers will often just retreat back to their man-cave and seethe in solitude. Roommates, however, might just be sufficiently nosy and busybodied to constantly poke and mosey around. Some might try to involve themselves into the date, to add another person or persons for which you have to court-jester and monkey-dance.
If a girl’s otherwise being difficult, another option is to agree to a date at a bar/lounge near your place, but tell her you’ll meet her downstairs/outside/in the lobby of your building or whatever. You can facilitate this by sending her an Uber/Lyft/taxi/etc. When she arrives, just start talking and walking back to your place like you’re giving a guided tour. Almost always they’ll naturally follow without objection, and you can just proceed like the planned date was drinks at your place all along. Even if you don’t bang her then and there and you do have to take her to a bar/lounge, her having already been in your place means she’ll be more likely to return afterward for the finish.
Sloot
16d ago
Sounds like Paige Harden.
WOULD, btdubs.
Sloot
4mo ago
I just take a few grams after each meal. Still an annoying trivial inconvenience, but harder to forget that way.
Sloot
6mo ago
I had Fury ahead on points and he barely looked fazed when knocked-down compared to the times when he was knocked-down by Wilder, but it was an embarrassing performance.
I saw a post-fight /r/boxing comment to the effect of: "This fight is boxing's 9/11."
"Unreasonably effective" is a great way to describe Ngannou. We've gone from "hahaha how is MMA real?! Just punch hard" to "hahaha how is boxing real?! Just punch hard". We've gone from "MMA-fighters stand no chance in boxing" to "Ngannou vs. Wilder/Joshua when and what excuse will Wilder/Joshua provide while ducking?"
Fury has long been DYEL skinny-fat, but it actually annoyed me a bit this time seeing him juxtaposed against Ngannou in the ring. The lack of fucks given is almost offensive. If I were Fury and cared about my lEgAcY in addition to other con$ern$, I'd blast a steroid cycle, eat some Ubereem horse meat, and/or take a Lebron-style trip to South Beach before unifying the belts against Usyk. Then re-match with Ngannou and deliver a convincing defeat.
I do. Attraction is not a choice: For the most part, it's not a plan or anything, especially not initially. Men (including married men) who have credible signals that they have sexual access to other women in their lives induce more tingles than men who do not, just as tall men are more attractive than short men.
Sloot
8mo ago
Funnily enough it was Lang Lang who cemented Alla Turca’s status as a meme song.
Sloot
8mo ago
Pretty much. Chicks often prefer being the n’th sidepiece of a Chad rather than having a whole Brad to themselves, especially if they can keep teasing enough crumbs to Brads to keep them orbiting as back-up plans.
The first sentence was a joke, clearly. I did not, in fact, take a girl out to a field and make her chase down footballs that I kicked, whether it be the handegg or divegrass kind. However, come to think of it, I do hope to attain such a level of Chaddery some day.
The rest of it is—for better or worse—not a joke; in some ways I wish we lived in a timeline in which it were. The above has been my strategy for several years now spanning across different cities and countries, both when I’ve been traveling and when I’m just otherwise chilling at my home city at the time.
Chicks will happily throw on bikinis to eat hot chip and lie around the pool and the beach, thot around at random pool and yacht parties, music festivals, sports bra and spandex shorts to go to the gym. They actively seek out activities where they have plausible deniability to wear skimpy outfits. It’s hardly putting them on the spot or asking for much to get them into a bikini for a first date. Chicks rather enjoy being sex objects, might as well play it to your benefit.
Sloot
10mo ago
Right. Just like one doesn't have to be a pearl-clutching scold in order to simply not want to hang out in the place with the various 'ists and 'phobes.
Before you over think it, research suggests that women are far more diverse in their preferences in men than the obverse.
If I squint a bit I could see how this could be true in a vacuum, hence the concept of niche-maxxing for men on the red/purple/blackpill interwebs. However, in practice, female mate choice-copying leads to women wanting the same men, whether via OLD, social media, or meat-space social circle.
Sloot
11mo ago
Solid overview.
However, some of those points might be better characterised as black-pilled nowadays. Also—soft, euphemistic blue-pill language is somehow leaking through: e.g., “sleeping with”.
Sloot
1yr ago
By coincidence, I already posted a Chris Rock link in this thread.
However, there's also another relevant Rock bit on conditional/unconditional love. "Only women, children, and dogs are loved unconditionally. A man is only loved under the condition that he provides something."
Seems like an effective strategy. 'I put myself out there and everyone hates me. Oh how vulnerable a woman I am at the moment.'
It’d be pretty typical female online double-dipping.
I attempted to attention whore, but some people were mean to me and now I am sad. Please show your support and let you and them fight.
I chuckled seeing the usually laconic Cowen warn: “not interested in comments mocking Katja, put them somewhere else, I will delete them”
Perhaps.
Indeed, historically and prehistorically-speaking, a daughter would be more likely to give you at least one grandchild compared to a son. However, a son can potentially give you many, such that the median/average is a wash, with maybe the average tilting in favor of a son (depending on who you are).
Especially in modern-times, there’s no guarantee a whoredaughter will provide more grandchildren than a failson, despite the dick and creampies she’s taken.
A failson might even provide more grandchildren than a success-son. A failson who spent his 20s as a bartender, leaving three children with some combination of babies’ mommas. Or a failson who, as a school teacher, married a former student in her late teens or early 20s, and they went on to have three or more children.
Versus a success-son, who Was a Decent Person and adhered faithfully to a PMC girl he met in undergrad, graduate school, or at work, after she had accumulated some miles under her belt. They get married in their late 20s to mid 30s, where they might eventually eke out a child or two with everyone’s fingers crossed. Zero children is a material possibility.
Another reason why having mutiple children is clutch, to diversify your offspring outcomes (and potential heartbreaks, whether it be failsons or whoredaughters).
Dealing with female passivity, flakiness, and fickleness, the female inability and indifference to uphold their word, is a common source of frustration for men that transcends time and space when it comes to dating.
Even after carpet-bombing messages on social media and/or OLD, cold-approach grinding, or the stars aligning such that your social circle gifts you with a prospect, you still need to perform the scheduling battleship and text-message jiu-jitsu to get a given girl to agree to a date. And even after she agrees, in the hours leading up to a date, it’s very possible she’ll cancel, ghost, or request to reschedule. Of course, if you call her out for her lack of accountability and trustworthiness, you’d be the weird anti-social asshole questioning her Wonderfulness, Lived Experience, and Emotional Truth.
There are no magic words, no "one weird trick"s. Check-in too little prior to a date and she might bail under the excuse that she didn’t hear from you, supposedly presuming you lost interest or that the date was off. Check-in too much and it might give her the ick, that you’re too insecure, obsessed, or pressuring.
As the time of the date approaches, aside from being late and/or flaking, a lot of girls will also exploit the fact that you’re basically a hostage waiting for them. At the last minute, a lot of them will try to re-plan the date such that you have to spend maximal time and money, and with minimal chances of her putting out. “Actually, can we meet at [expensive restaurant] instead?”
A lot of them will claim to run late with minimal communication and then cancel while you’re continuing to wait for them. Unfortunately or fortunately, a lot of them will also claim to run late with minimal communication before showing up. This is why I angle for the first date to occur at my place: Logistics to get the bang, more cost-effective, I can wait at my place instead of having gone somewhere if she’s running late, “running late,” cancels and/or ghosts.
The only real defense for a man is playing the numbers game and having enough prospects to diversify. It’s less devastating if your Tuesday night flakes when you still have Wednesday and Thursday night dates scheduled with other girls. Easier to drop your Saturday night if she plays hardball and insists on meeting at a restaurant, when you have a Sunday afternoon. Eventually one will come through.
Furthermore, one can schedule two dates the same day (e.g., 1PM and 7PM), such that if the earlier cancels you at least have the latter one. If the latter one cancels later on, at least you had the earlier one. If things go poorly with the 1PM, you still have the 7PM. If things go well with the 1PM at a slow pace, you can cancel on the 7PM. If things go really well with the 1PM at a fast pace, you can escort her out and go forth with the 7PM date.
Staggering dates is also an option. For example, scheduling an early afternoon date with one girl at 1PM, and the other at 3PM. If the 1PM girl shows up, great, and you cancel on the 3PM. If the 1PM flakes you might still have the 3PM.
One can also double book (or more), scheduling two dates at the same time with different girls. This way it helps increase the chances that one of them shows up. Once you have a fair degree of confidence that one will show-up, you can cancel on the other. Although, meanwhile, the one who you think will show-up might just flake on you at the last moment. The more GigaChad maneuver would be to have both show-up, where they can fight over you and/or you go for the threesome.
Canceling and/or floating reschedules on girls is risky, as they’ll act like you violated the Geneva Convention in offending their Princess Complex (even though they wouldn’t have given the slightest of fucks to flake on you), which could lead to you losing a hard-earned prospect.
There’s no reason to go easy and Be A Decent Person and/or Be a Gentleman. Young women are more than okay with wasting your time, money, energy. Not only are they largely indifferent to your time, a lot of them put a negative value on it. Wasting your time, money, energy, feeds their vanity and sense of validation. Many women will brag about it: “Only here to be spoiled," “Buy me food and tell me I’m pretty," “Just here to waste your time,” reads many a female online dating profile.
Young women are basically bratty children when it comes to scheduling and flaking. It’s essentially a survival tactic if you want to see a girl again, to bang her ASAP. This way she at least has skin in the game and will be more of a teammate in scheduling and coordinating.
Sloot
3mo ago
For some reason I hadn’t seen that site before.
Not only was there good information density screenwise, it practically gave me a jumpscare by how quickly it loaded.
I've personally never noticed a difference when taking creatine or not, whether it be bad things like bloating and cramping or good things like better swoleness and gym performance.
However, I take at least 5 grams each day because why not? Creatine is cheap, might as well satiate the placebo effect. From The ScienceTM and gymbro word-of-mouth over the past 25 years or so, creatine is possibly the most effective legal supplement, aside from protein-supplementation. Gun to my head, I would estimate it has, on average, a mild positive effect.
It's also likely diet-dependent: Creatine is naturally found in red-meat, so there may be diminishing marginal effects if you eat beef. There's been some studies suggesting that creatine-supplementation can be especially good for vegetarians, including for cognitive ability.
Sloot
8mo ago
I would be shocked if anyone is reading anything in the profile at all. Other than swiping purely based on pictures. See: all those tinder experiments where the bio literally talks about being a child predator and a laundry list of other felonies with pictures of a male model and still gets 100s of thirsty chicks in the dm.
Even more black-pilling: Many of those chicks did read the profile and were still more than down to get railed.
Sloot
8mo ago
Gym question: why is it that online gym experts always recommend bench press, squats and deadlifts over any of the other machines in the weights room?
Probably efficiency of some combination of time and learning curve as those exercises hit a bunch of muscle groups, and build a foundation to transition to other exercises later on. I often skimp on leg exercises altogether as they make no difference to my attractiveness unlike big arms, capped delts, and 3D traps (strength/dominance signals that chicks love).
A common argument for free weights, especially dumbbells instead of barbells when relevant, is stabilizer recruitment and operating in a 3D as opposed to 2D plane. However, personally, I'm not convinced stabilizer recruitment is a plus, as it just means more imprecise targeting of muscles. What I like about free-weights (especially dumbbells) is the increased range of motion and greater flexibility in defining the start point, end point, and traveling path of the exercise. Using machines can be pretty awkward relative to free weights once the weights get heavy enough.
Another argument for dumbbells is symmetry, which I agree with. With barbells and machines oftentimes peoples' dominant sides are leading their weak sides. It's harder to cheat with dumbbells in this manner. Safety can also be a concern. It's generally easier to bail out of exercises with heavy weights using dumbbells than barbells.
let_them_fight.gif
The actions of US nurses in recent years have updated my priors against them, for they have gassed themselves up as “essential workers” while posting tikthot dances on social media.
Which is darkly hilarious: Imagine being a bed-ridden patient with a request pending to your nurse while she’s out in the hallway attention-whoring for social media, where you can hear the shitty music being replayed over and over again and thumping through your room again and again (like you’re getting tortured like a prisoner of war), the recurring cacophony of giggles, squeals, shrieks, bumps, and crashes while she repeats takes with her coworkers until they get a sufficiently cUuUuUte take for social media… before she deigns to return to you when she has a spare moment. She’ll roll her eyes, "Ugh, stupid patient, so needy and thirsty. Can't he see I’m a BUSY essential worker."
US white women should know by now that race generally trumps sex when it comes to idpol considerations. If they didn’t know from undergraduate admissions affirmative action statistics, they should at least know from anecdotes such as Central Park Karen.
More options
Context Copy link