From my viewing of the video, it seems clear that the driver tried to run over the ICE agent first, at which point the agent responded by opening fire. Could have been handled better, but still a justified shooting.
The more I hear about university politics, the more I conclude that they have too much power. Their authority needs to be separated into isolated chunks. They should not be teaching courses and then evaluating their own performance by giving exams as well. They should not be setting tuition fees and also collecting them. They should not be both centers of mass-education for undergrads and also the education of the elite few who go on to PhD and Master's courses.
Most of all, the powers they have which resemble the powers of the judicial system in any way need to be taken away. Universities are not courts of law, they do not have the accountability, moral fiber, or training to do law properly, and any incident which requires the intervention of a court should be handled by an actual court of law.
This is pure whattaboutism. The topic of discussion is Somali welfare fraud. The President has nothing to do with it. If the President was a clone of Adolf Hitler he would still have nothing to do with it. There is no level of racism in the heart of the President of the United States that would change the ethical calculus to make welfare fraud okay.
Freedom of speech means that the government can't put you in jail for your speech. It doesn't mean your employer can't fire you if the speech you make while representing them as part of your job is damaging to the institution.
If a PR spokesperson for a grocery store dropped an N-bomb on national TV and triggered a political backlash, their employer would have every right to fire them on the spot, freedom of speech or no. Freedom of speech is not the right to keep your job in spite of gross incompetence.
I think this is a fine outcome. Getting repeatedly shot is more than enough punishment for ramming a cop with your car, there's no need to additionally send her to prison.
- Prev
- Next

I had the same thought. Even if you do meet someone with the intention of having sex with them, it's a further escalation if they get fully naked before you arrive. The combination of catfishing and rapid unwanted unreciprocated escalation would certainly shock me, although I admit I'm not a gay doctor so maybe I'm not as jaded as Mr A.
It actually feels to me like a comedy beat in some kind of off-beat sketch.
"I've got a hot date?"
"Where?"
"In the bathroom on the 3rd floor."
"Is he hot?"
"Check out his profile pic." (The profile pic shows an attractive white man in his late 20's who vaguely resembles Pete Buttigieg.) "Wish me luck!"
<Smash cut to the bathroom. A stall door slowly swings open to reveal a fully-naked older man of ambiguous ethnicity, grinning creepily while maintaining eye contact. The camera is aimed too high to see his genitals, but his arm can be seen moving suggestively in that area.>
<Pan to Mr. A, who looks into the camera and screams.>
More options
Context Copy link