ToaKraka
Dislikes you
No bio...
User ID: 108
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
9mo ago
Prosecutorial discretion is a bad thing. If all laws were enforced to the hilt 100 percent of the time, then legislators would be very quickly incentivized by public outcry to make the definitions and the penalties for those crimes more reasonable.
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
9mo ago
Crystal Cafe is the female (femcel?) equivalent to 4chan's /r9k/ (incel?) board.
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
9mo ago
So am I. You don't need to be a lawyer in order to find interesting court opinions.
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
9mo ago
an outsider like me
Feel free to post opinions from your own country's judicial system.
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
9mo ago
Some renewed life has also been breathed into the idea of a CANZUK confederation.
The leader of the UK Liberal Democrats, Ed Davey, has publicly endorsed CANZUK in a recent newspaper column.
Following the resignation of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, four candidates have emerged to become the next leader of the Liberal Party of Canada, with two of the candidates [Carney and Baylis] resoundingly endorsing CANZUK during a televised leadership debate.
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
9mo ago
-
Elizabeth is driving a 2016 Honda CR-V at 50 miles per hour on a two-lane undivided road. She drifts over the centerline and hits an oncoming car, driven by Ann. Both Elizabeth and Ann are killed in the crash. Ann's estate sues Elizabeth's estate, and presumably extracts a large settlement.
-
Ann's estate also sues Honda. The estate's theory is that the CR-V counts as an unsafe vehicle, making Honda liable for the crash, because Honda failed to make "lane-departure warning" and "lane-keeping assist" technologies standard rather than optional in that vehicle.
-
The trial judge rejects this argument and dismisses the case, and the appeals panel affirms. A manufacturer does not have a duty to install every available safety-enhancing technology. The base 2016 CR-V has a steering system sufficient to enable the motorist to keep the vehicle in its lane, so it counts as "safe".
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
9mo ago
According to Wikipedia, this decentralization was instituted by Deng Xiaoping back in the 1980s. Quoting various books published since 2008:
The governance of China is characterized by a high degree of political centralization but significant economic decentralization. Policy instruments or processes are often tested locally before being applied more widely, resulting in a policy that involves experimentation and feedback. Generally, central government leadership refrains from drafting specific policies, instead using the informal networks and site visits to affirm or suggest changes to the direction of local policy experiments or pilot programs. The typical approach is that central government leadership begins drafting formal policies, law, or regulations after policy has been developed at local levels.
After [Deng's] economic reform, China has been characterized by a high degree of political centralization but significant economic decentralization. The central government sets the strategic direction while local officials carry it out, including developing the details of policy.
Laboratories of <del>democracy</del> <ins>socialism with Chinese characteristics</ins>
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
9mo ago
They do not automatically see all comments. Click the "report" button and wait (at least several hours) for them to show up.
The other commenter's opinion is that all "universal injunctions" issued by district judges are insane. See Justice Gorsuch's views on the topic.
It has become increasingly apparent that this Court must, at some point, confront these important objections to this increasingly widespread practice. As the brief and furious history of the regulation before us illustrates, the routine issuance of universal injunctions is patently unworkable, sowing chaos for litigants, the government, courts, and all those affected by these conflicting decisions. Rather than spending their time methodically developing arguments and evidence in cases limited to the parties at hand, both sides have been forced to rush from one preliminary injunction hearing to another, leaping from one emergency stay application to the next, each with potentially nationwide stakes, and all based on expedited briefing and little opportunity for the adversarial testing of evidence.
Sure they’re not a state in the sense of a flag, national anthem, and Olympic team, but on the other hand by such a measure neither is Palestine, Islamic State, Tibet, or Transnistria.
Definition of "state" under the Montevideo Convention:
The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualifications: (a) a permanent population; (b) a defined territory; (c) government; and (d) capacity to enter into relations with the other states.
Using that definition, Wikipedia includes Palestine and Transnistria in its list of sovereign states. The Islamic State and the cartels fail item b, while Tibet fails item d. (On the same page, Wikipedia does explicitly note that Palestine "has no agreed territorial borders", so one could argue that it fails item b as well.)
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
9mo ago
The original version of the first link pointed to an unintended location (which apparently varied depending on who clicked on it) because it included multiple tildes, which were misinterpreted as strikethrough formatting by this website's broken formatter.
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
9mo ago
I figured it out. The first link points to an unintended location because it includes multiple tildes, which are misinterpreted as strikethrough formatting by this website's broken formatter.
tfw your fellow forum-dweller posts a road that you have walked down multiple times as a "pretty good example" of an "ugly" "'stroad'"
On a serious note, I think you mixed up your links, as the first one and the second one are not in the same area.
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
9mo ago
I am waiting for somebody to make a video game in which the player designs a country's mail-distribution system, including the placement of sorting facilities.
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
9mo ago
Srpska is trying to secede from Bosnia.
The parliament of the autonomous Serb Republic was discussing on Thursday the draft of a new constitution that would equip the region with sovereign authority. It also provides for the creation of a separate Serb army and judiciary, as well as the right to self-determination and to join other state unions. [Srpska president] Dodik favours joining neighbouring Serbia.
Bosnia has been made up of the Bosniak–Croat Federation and the Serb Republic since the end of the 1992–95 war, in which 100,000 people were killed. They are linked by a weak central government in a state supervised by an international envoy whose role is to prevent the country slipping back into conflict.
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
9mo ago
General Tso's chicken/orange chicken is one of my favorite meals.
-
A person is charged with felony drunk driving. Since he was also convicted of drunk driving within the past five years, his driving license is immediately suspended pending trial, and hardship reinstatement of that license is unavailable.
-
Two months later, the defendant is scheduled to have a hearing. As the judge is walking into the courthouse, he personally observes the defendant drive his car into the courthouse's parking lot, get out, and walk into the courthouse.
-
Accordingly, at the hearing a few minutes later, the judge finds the defendant to be in contempt of court. The defendant's complaint that he has already spent more than a kilodollar on ride-hailing services is unavailing. (The penalty will be deternined later.)
You probably are aware that the typical address in the United States consists of a street and a number on that street, with the numbers ascending as you progress along the street, and with odd numbers on one side of the street and even numbers on the other side. A typical address might be "123 Main Street". In contrast, Japan uses a different system, in which most streets have no names, and municipalities instead are recursively subdivided into smaller areas. Wikipedia's example is "2-7-2 Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku", or in big-endian format "ward Chiyoda area Marunouchi district 2 block 7 address 2". (Compare the programming concept of recursively subdividing an area into ever-smaller pieces as a quadtree.)
Unlike the rest of the US, the US Virgin Islands (a former Danish possession in the Caribbean, inhabited by just 87,000 people as of 2020) uses a simple version of the Japan-style address system! Most streets have no names, and instead the three islands are divided into districts called "estates". A typical address might be "123 Richmond Estate".
Since around 2009, the USVI government has been executing a "Street Addressing Initiative", which will assign names to all the streets and convert the islands to the normal US system of street-based addressing. According to the 2-M$ contract for the "final phase", the project will finally be completed in March 2028.
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
9mo ago
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
9mo ago
Report of the Isthmian Canal Commission for 1899–1901 pp. 69–70:
The Tehuantepec summit is in the neighborhood of 700 feet above tide water. It is, moreover, a broad summit which cannot be materially lowered by any excavation of practicable dimensions. It is doubtful whether a water supply can be found for a summit level. It would require 20 locks of an average lift of nearly 35 feet on each side of the summit. The cost of these locks alone, on the basis of the estimates considered in another chapter of this report, would be about $200,000,000, while the canal would probably at least double this estimate. Attractive as the Tehuantepec route is from its geographical location, it must be discarded as impracticable for a canal.
That's 400 M$ for the Tehuantepec route, versus 190 M$ for the Nicaragua route and 180 M$ for the Panama route (pages 261–262). (To convert to 2025 dollars, multiply by 37—so, 15 G$ vs. 7.0 G$ and 6.7 G$.)
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
9mo ago
total trade union (so no customs at all)
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
9mo ago
ToaKraka
Dislikes you
9mo ago
According to the opinion, Kentucky's policy has held otherwise since 1914 (Burbank & Burbank v. Robek) at the latest.
I think there was already a big debate on this forum a few months ago regarding how "genocide" (killing people of the wrong ethnicity) and "ethnic cleansing" (forcing people of the wrong ethnicity to evacuate) are not the same thing and should not be considered as having the same gravity.
Genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(1) Killing members of the group;
(2) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(3) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(4) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(5) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
As ethnic cleansing has not been recognized as an independent crime under international law, there is no precise definition of this concept or the exact acts to be qualified as ethnic cleansing. A United Nations Commission of Experts mandated to look into violations of international humanitarian law committed in the territory of the former Yugoslavia defined ethnic cleansing in its interim report S/25274 as "rendering an area ethnically homogeneous by using force or intimidation to remove persons of given groups from the area". In its final report S/1994/674, the same Commission described ethnic cleansing as “a purposeful policy designed by one ethnic or religious group to remove by violent and terror-inspiring means the civilian population of another ethnic or religious group from certain geographic areas”.
I think that the Artsakh situation (people of the wrong ethnicity evacuate voluntarily) meets neither of those definitions. On the other hand, though, this Reuters article does cite "several international experts" who say that the Artsakh situation does count as "ethnic cleansing", because "Azerbaijan's destruction of essential supplies" counts as intentionally forcing the Armenians to leave.
The Canadian territories are too small in terms of population to be reasonable states. The three Canadian territories combined have only 130,000 people, despite their huge land area. That's significantly fewer than the least populous Canadian province's 180,000 people, and far fewer than the least populous US state's 590,000 people.
More options
Context Copy link