You do not need to speculate about rebel weapons that much. Lexington and Concord was triggered by an attempt by the British to seize colonial military supplies including cannons. Either British actions were legitimate (which calls into question the existence of the US) or were not (in which case private ownership of weapons of war is a-ok).
p
You do not need to speculate about rebel weapons that much. Lexington and Concord was triggered by an attempt by the British to seize colonial military supplies including cannons. Either British actions were legitimate (which calls into question the existence of the US) or were not (in which case private ownership of weapons of war is a-ok).
More options
Context Copy link