@Tretiak's banner p

Tretiak

If you know you know, if you don’t you don’t.

0 followers   follows 1 user  
joined 2023 May 22 21:47:03 UTC

#209, #StandUpLocust, #MurphysFerry, Surah Yunus 10:71

Verified Email

				

User ID: 2418

Tretiak

If you know you know, if you don’t you don’t.

0 followers   follows 1 user   joined 2023 May 22 21:47:03 UTC

					

#209, #StandUpLocust, #MurphysFerry, Surah Yunus 10:71


					

User ID: 2418

Verified Email

If there was a glut of people in the rhetoric or philosophy department that could handle themselves well in this kind of debate they'd be able to make a splash in the debate scene, which is fairly open.

William Lane Craig has been doing this his entire life. That’s what debate is. Destiny understands zero about debate, because the fool doesn’t [and probably can’t] read academic literature. Norman Finkelstein trolling him was always hilarious to watch.

By fashion management are you talking about the retail side or brand management? I’d imagine luxury and even mid-tier brand managers understand the trends and forces quite well. On the outlet side of things, I can see how they’d be suffering.

The recent updates to Gemini that I’ve experienced have felt like night and day compared with the iterations of maybe 3-6 months ago. It seems to parse and select for data that’s relevant to what I ask it without losing context as easily. It’s getting better at handling edge cases too, but it’s still imperfect.

You can already approximate some unique experiences in modern VR, although I’ve never tried it. I’m still waiting for the day law enforcement gets involved when someone decides to make a sim that allows you to smoke crack and generate the psychological state of getting high without actually doing it. When the day comes though for the kind of thing @Primaprimaprima is pondering, it’s not going to be a pleasant one in one respect, because human beings are going to have to rethink so many things about what we actually are.

Oh shit. Shots fired.

That’s a quote I’ve really taken to heart over the years. A basic charity and generosity is obliged to others, per Catholic social doctrine. Beyond that though, I closely guard what’s in my self-interest and I’m not stupid. If someone puts in a tall order that involves me, they’re absolutely going to pay for it. Over the decades I’ve collected so many favors from others, I own as much social debt in my friend group as Japan owns financial debt on the US economy; and they know it.

My father used to tell me “the trick is not to make an emotional investment,” and “judgment is the first step to attachment.” I’m a highly judgmental man and it’s taken a lot for me to temper that characteristic and I have to a great degree; but it’s also meant that I don’t entertain bullshit. When you lose control emotionally and get mad, you’re not solving anything, you’re just mad at that point; and you become a hostage to the next thought and whatever emotional punchline it contains.

Yep. I’ve mentioned the Reproducibility Crisis here before. Science isn’t as airtight and rock solid as people think it is. Small sample size effects, lack of long-term consistent results, etc.

In some select domains, sure. But I’m also pretty confident the Dred Scot decision isn’t being upheld anywhere in the US anymore.

No, I know that’s what you were saying. My point is that there’s a reason why that moral precept is put before science and it’s not a conclusion of it. If a person wanted to wholly structure a society purely based on the scientific facts of the matter, it’s not one they would likely want to live in.

Speaks really poorly of the quality of the publication too, if it’s allowed to pass. I remember reading a paper once in a “journal” (that actually had some legitimate backing) about the possibility of igniting Saturn with a nuclear weapon and I was thinking, “What the fuck is this shit?,” as I made my way through it. Academia in no way is this sort of purified, pristine landscape of nothing but rigorous logical and scientific clarity that people think it is. There’s at least as much bad science as people think there is good. And some areas of it are outright corrupt.

If that’s the case we need to pull from Kiwi Farms more. They never have this problem, /s.

Why are we constantly raising the bar and treating adults as children? They are not so underdeveloped that they should be lacking this much in the sense and good judgment department. In my parents heyday, young children were doing very complex tasks (no they weren’t doing hard labor, thank God) and learning on the fast track. There’s been a great coddling of people in the 21st century.

People I work with at my current job think I’m some kind of magical worker for no other reason than the fact that I do my job. It has nothing to do with that at all. It’s a product of the culture I was raised in. Young children are adults in training.

It's not like we don't have lots of evidence of negligent or even outright fraudulent publications in even reputable journals.

There was a meta analysis done once that showed about 50% of peer reviewed papers turn out to be false. If you look at something like PubMed epidemiological literature, a lot of it is riddled with multicollinearity that severely impacts the precision of their regression estimates. This was actually acknowledged in findings of their own studies. But it generalizes across disciplines. You find it in Neoclassical economics where models have been repeatedly subjected to different datasets and the existing structure falls completely apart.

There’s a reason citizens have “equality before the law.” You surely don’t find the principle alive in science or the animal kingdom. Some technocratic societies seek to implement a limited version of that in specific domains, but an entire society founded on such principles I’d imagine would be a very miserable one for anyone who’s not a top performer.

I used to be like that. I still am but less so given the way I’d get treated. If it’s an elderly woman or a man who seems really down on his luck, I’ll offer a helping hand and some of my time, but I don’t do it for just anyone anymore.

Well, if one of my homegirls really needed help and couldn’t get it elsewhere and she offered to buy or make dinner later (I’ve had this happen), sure; why not? (I wouldn’t do this if I was in a relationship though, unless my girlfriend/spouse was okay with it) If on the other hand she thought she could dial me up because she was a pretty face who was entitled to my assistance for no other reason than the fact she exists, she wouldn’t be in my contact list for very long. As we used to say growing up: ass, grass or cash for those girls.

He tends to become active around topics like this. There are a large minority of topical users on TM who only come alive when the discussion shifts around to certain issues. There’s a reason I don’t partake in a lot of the political discussion here. It’s mostly arguing on incremental, insignificant tidbits of current events that aren’t going to end up going anywhere. Culture War is too top heavy on that dialogue IMO.

That more than anything is what gets me in hot water with others. Irony and immature sarcasm is a huge part of how I live my life. There’s a reason in past circles whenever my name gets brought up, “smart ass” is the first thing that comes to people’s minds. I have found that people either hate it or love it. It doesn’t mean I’m not out to present and deliver the logical argument; I am and I do, but I don’t see the problem with occasionally adding a little flair to things.

If you change your mind too much as time goes on, that’s different from simply disliking half of what you buy.

There used to be a company called Trunk Club (that I think was bought out by another entity), that sought to solve this problem for you. What you would do is image yourself, and an associate with I guess(?) a qualified fashion sense would go out and shop for clothing and brands on your behalf, you’d pay for the clothing plus the markup for the shopper, and your clothes would be shipped directly to your front door. You’ll could still return them if you didn’t like them. I never used them at all but I found it very interesting when I first heard about it.

I can understand his point. Some people just have horrible fashion sense and their ideas about what they think will look good just don’t match when they suit up. I get most of my clothing from Buckle. It’s become my default, one stop shop for everything and the style is right up my alley.

Much of this can be easily challenged. Consider the other side of the coin and look at people who have achieved celebrity wholly unworthy of the status. I see people who think “Destiny” is a good debater. Destiny is a fast talking moron with a permanent case of bed head who treats Google like it’s some sort of “God machine,” that can spit out conclusions he agrees with all day to win arguments. That’s… not how that works… And the people who look up to and idolize him are fools. If you want to see good debaters in action, look in the philosophy and rhetoric departments. Not Jordan Peterson. Or Matt Dillahunty. Etc. There’s plenty of people like this. What Elon and Belichick have in contrast with the others is competency.

The open relationship is a complete non-starter for any guy she’s likely to be interested in that has a brain cell. Any woman who would front the idea of an open relationship either already has someone in mind, or is cheating on you and just doesn’t want to bother with having to hide things anymore. The only real men out there of her wish pool that would “tolerate” that are ones that don’t have options.

That’s not really his point, I think. His point is that if you’ve already served that purpose, there’s nothing further to gain insofar as you offered assistance freely without anything in return; and as such, you get marked as “that” guy. You’re basically a chump.

To your first point, you’ve just described Briffault’s Law. I don’t know how many people here would strongly contest that point, but I’ve observed much the same. Maybe “help,” here and there, depends on the circumstance but sure. If she’s asking me to sacrifice, she’s going to have to begin negotiations. The only people I will unconditionally sacrifice for is my family. Most of these arguments rarely end up disputing the points of the other side directly. Instead they argue on the length and degrees of different factors.