@aardvark2's banner p

aardvark2


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 1 user  
joined 2022 November 16 09:17:52 UTC

				

User ID: 1873

aardvark2


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 1 user   joined 2022 November 16 09:17:52 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 1873

We need economies of scale.

Most incentives for fertility produce more of the last two groups

Well, many of the incentives are fixed or available to poor only, so it's by design. u RandomRanger did not offer any of such incentives.

Isn't Saruman at lower level of divine pyramid (or how it's called?) than Sauron and cannot defeat him in any case?

and some HBD people believe we should edit genes to uplift future children's intelligence far above than we have any differences in existing populations now. Where do they fit?

such comments are against rules of themotte. and what exactly do you mean by 'intelligent' here?

some of mottizens wrote that they saw possibility of Ukraine conquering Moscow. I guess they are cretinous idiots?

Fun fact: https://www.writingtoiq.com/ estimates this comment to 102. I thought due to word "cuckolds" but my attempts to reword in order to increase score failed. (ps, ok, got 109 then i got lazy)

I tried 7 your comments, => 123 Hlynka's (N=7) => 111 comments Hlynka was replying to => 119 (*in case if comment Hlynka was replying to was too short, next parent comment by another person was tried)

These 7 your comments have weird distibution 91 102 119 129 137 143 143

Russia had positive net migration for most all post-1991 years, first a large fraction of that was ethnic Russians repatriating, now it's mostly Central Asian Muslims, both gastarbeiters and permanent setllers. ... of course, streams in and out are quite different in IQ etc.

Russia also has declining birthrates, so the population ratio might very well be constant.

No it wasn't constant. In 1991, it was 3:1 but it soon became 4:1, as Ukraine both had less TFR and negative net migration. Russia's ethnic minorities (esp. Muslims) have greater TFR.

Is there a correlation between sports discipline practiced by a man and man's SMV?

Socio-economic status has little to do with woman having a degree. Suppose a man marries woman without a degree, but all her male relatives have degrees. Compare versus where a woman has degree but her relatives are high school dropout.

nuclear blackmail, and there's no limiting factor once that is established as precedent.

There is. There are other countries with nukes. So any nuclear blackmail has equilibrium.

It's dishonest to say there isn't.

How do you get different species at all? Populations diverge until they are different species. It looks like most of progeny neardertal-sapiens was infertile. Where's Flores Hobbits now? They didn't die because of climate change, nor they were assimilated.

Black Americans and White Americans aren't living on different sides of Iron Curtain set by a totalitarian dictatorship(s). Same language, same religion, same currency, same sports, same worship of Kim Kardashian's rear parts.

[offtopic] ...Imagine if a country begins to engineer radiation-immune people.

Did you want to say "wokism"?

Genetic IQ enhancement in a narrow sense wouldnt fix that,

In some sense, low mutational load is easier to get rid of: if you have good genome editing, but few data samples for study, you can just eliminate rare alleles in embryo rather than look for correlations in huge dataset for useful alleles. (Some have speculated that bc. long-term effect of purging of rare alleles is bad, there might be action to require people who purge old rare alleles to also take some new rare alleles).

Also, IQ is much more affected by mutational load that most traits. If our hypothetical uplifted 120 IQs would have somewhat shorter lifespans than natural 120 IQs, it's still a win.

noone has run an RCT on IQ increases, because we havent been able to do them.

No. We aren't doing RCT on IQ increases because our society is hostile towards it. We could have just cloned some genuises already, it's simpler, but we don't.

There must be some pleiotropy, because most species sit in local optima for most of the time.

You know, there isn't that a 4-million dataset is open for everyone for study. For privacy reasons, large GWAS studies are only combing linear correlations together. We know incest is bad yet those GWAS studies fail to show it. This is very crude model and you shouldn't take it too seriously.

examples

Pursuing search for eternal life instead of reproducing oneself.

Low SMV (for men), ceteris paribus.

Being a cuck.

Writing long, elaborate, texts into defence for being a cuck.

Holodomor occured because of economist policy of that government. Turning Holodomor into a tribal issue is a way to make more hostility and real corpses in future.

Meanwhile, in Ukraine private ownership of land wasn't working until as recently as 2019. In many ways post-1991 Ukraine was more sovok than post-1991 Russia

Why anti-HBD people don't promote e.g. usage of artificial languages like Lojban? (the only example I know is early Soviets promoting Esperanto). Wouldn't be type of language affecting individual's development a lot? Also, Chinese and Japanese have problem that word lookup is difficult. This is a less problem is smartphone era, but earlier finding a word was pretty difficult whereas in alphabetic languages any child can find word in dictionary fairly quickly. I read someone hypothesing that this must have negative effect on social mobility.

imagine comparing transistor density to chip speed, or transistor number to chip speed

???

There are wide classes of "Embarrassingly parallel" tasks where relationship is nearly linear

  1. not all birds fly, and anyway birds have slop similar to those of reptiles.

  2. larger bodies have about same number of components as smaller ones, and very easily large animal might have less degrees of freedom than small (horse vs. rat or even snake). Snakes are small brained despite having more degrees of freedom than any mammal. And the only parts which larger bodies have more complex are gastrointestinal tract and lungs, are not individiually controlled by brain.

Incidentally, how do heritability estimates discriminate between genes that "causally" influence height

They don't. Heritability refers to given population in given environment. Gene effect depends on environment (you don't need gene to make vitamin C it your environment has excess of it) and even on frequency of it in population. In a food scarce environment gene which increases bone growth might as well have smaller effect than genes which allow to get more food. So of course simple linear regression, which GWAS is, wouldn't tell about many things.

So if you run a GWAS identifying N promising genes for affecting height on US citizens, you couldn't use that to reliably increase the height of European babies?

Because junk food mainly affects width and not height, this is unlikely to be a problem. And it's not that Europe is free or junk food too.

I want to whine about weakly upvoted comment https://www.themotte.org/post/109/culture-war-roundup-for-the-week/15573?context=8#context

In a strictly genetic sense, the Mongols may be one of the most successful people groups in history; in terms of their culture, society, and way of life, they are largely extinct

The Mongol culture didn't spread because the premise (genetic success) is BS. Mongol conquests were due to better generals, discipline and ability to recruit non-Mongols into their war machine. They routinely beat numerically superior armies.

p.s:

So it's a very bad example of thesis 'genetic success doesn't imply cultural success', rather it's evidence in another direction.

Another thing I have with this that it looks poster is Western supermacist and imagines Mongols aka dumb zerg being strong only with their number.

one of reasons I wish Russia win over Ukraine (if closely aligned with EU&US they will get this too, eventually)

Could you please state why?

towards China and Iran, solidifying an anti-Western axis that spans Eurasia

Fun:looks somewhat like Mongol Empire.

so that Kiev can hold onto predominently Russian-speaking territories whose population mostly doesn't even want to be part of Ukraine?

It looks like that before population movement, only Crimea had solid majority who didn't want to be in Ukraine. Speaking Russian language doesn't necessarily mean being want to be part of Russia, compare Ireland and UK for example.