I am not saying that he necessarily believes all the things in the first list, but he feels that they are at least understandable or positions that a reasonable person may hold.
But not only does he not say the Holocaust was a good thing, he equates believing that it was with the hatefulness he won't tolerate. The only mention of the Holocaust in his post was already quoted above:
...so those 15,000 are just the nakedly hateful, the-Holocaust-isn’t-real-but-I-wish-it-was people.
Are you taking him so literally as to be saying that both boxes (denying the Holocaust and approving of the Holocaust) always need to be checked before he'll
consider blocking someone, but he has no problem with either view taken in isolation?
But not only does he not say the Holocaust was a good thing, he equates believing that it was with the hatefulness he won't tolerate. The only mention of the Holocaust in his post was already quoted above:
Are you taking him so literally as to be saying that both boxes (denying the Holocaust and approving of the Holocaust) always need to be checked before he'll consider blocking someone, but he has no problem with either view taken in isolation?
More options
Context Copy link