Thanks for confirming. I thought I was taking crazy pills. I downgrade my initial assessment, this was not a great story.
Yeah this is my take too.
Also, maybe I am dumb but I still don't understand why it helped the AI that there was a manual override.
Sorry I wasn't trying to be snarky. The original comment seemed to make it seem like truth about matters of fact was a minor issue that could be routed around, but in my experience that was the central problem with all religions.
Is it? As someone who took religion seriously enough on its own terms to be turned off by its falsity, it seems like a central problem that no religion has solved, by virtue of them all explicitly saying false things.
Great incomprehensible story. Some feedback:
- Did the sister end up mattering? What was the first guy supposed to do differently if his sister was in the straight?
- The American and Japanese AIs are just supposed to collaborate without a dispute resolution mechanism? That sounds dumb.
- I didn't follow how it mattered that this particular person was woken up. What was she supposed to do differently than the others? Why didn't she want to be honest?
- "We have no confirmed evidence" - I think a general would be able to smell BS at this phrasing. Why don't you just have her lie?
- Prev
- Next
public school teachers are a parasite class? this seems like it's painting with a broad brush.
More options
Context Copy link