What I can point out is that, from a lawyer-side viewpoint, and I mean literal lawyers, the process she went through is so staggeringly unjust that even if she's 100% obviously guilty it will still shock and horrify a lawyer.
Can you explain what you find so egregious here? Coming from industry, not academia, they seem to have gone to much greater lengths to treat Gino fairly than any other employer would have. I could be fired on the spot for falsifying data - Harvard:
spent 18 months investigating the claims (2021 - 2023)
the result of which was a 1200 page report recommending termination (2023)
placed her on administrative leave
defended a lawsuit from her claiming defamation, discrimination based on gender, and a few other things (2024)
finally terminated her after 2 years suspension (2025).
I don't think there's any chance I'd remain employed for 2 years whilst credibly accused by peers, and filing lawsuits against my employer. 'Staggeringly unjust' doesn't really seem to fit the process as applied.
p
Can you explain what you find so egregious here? Coming from industry, not academia, they seem to have gone to much greater lengths to treat Gino fairly than any other employer would have. I could be fired on the spot for falsifying data - Harvard:
I don't think there's any chance I'd remain employed for 2 years whilst credibly accused by peers, and filing lawsuits against my employer. 'Staggeringly unjust' doesn't really seem to fit the process as applied.
More options
Context Copy link