@flitter's banner p

flitter


				

				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 September 09 03:31:38 UTC

				

User ID: 1058

flitter


				
				
				

				
0 followers   follows 0 users   joined 2022 September 09 03:31:38 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 1058

Sounds neat, can you send this to me as well?

Agreed, but I think OP would also agree with you. Genes are the primary reproductive unit right now. The secondary reproductive unit right now is the ideas on top of genes. Genes are currently the smallest reproductive unit, the recursive loop of evolution. Memes form on top of them and are influenced by them (see Idiocracy for fictional evidence), but in the future with bio-electronics or large matrices the ideas could create a new primary reproductive unit whose behavior would begin influencing the ideas instead of genes.

In the way that a sculptor discovers the statue, the Hock will break you until only Strength remains

The Hock will fix everything

Interesting, I find the consistent tree structure more intuitive than the sibling only branching screenshot. Props to customization

https://old.reddit.com/r/TheMotte/comments/eabgr3/even_space_marines_need_artillery_support_why_i/

Warhammer 40k, StarWars, Fascism, Equality. Even Spacemarines need artillery support.

This makes sense to me, even if I don't fully agree. There's some truth to how these "hawks" and "doves" will have a overpopulation life-cycle.

On the other hand I suspect there's an underlying structure to these positions (motte) that would suggest that there are stable "optimal" environment behaviors (bailey) that suggests an underlying weak-ordering to how moral a system is (double bailey)

That makes sense, direct editing is going to cause a lot of indirect problems. Similar to immune system or dietary supplements.

minimizing how many instructions you need to add to the genome in order to make something happen

This is the mechanism for why the body isn't fully optimized: it has to be backwards compatible and build iteratively off of previous DNA. That tech debt is exactly what an artificial engineered brain/body could re-design.

A major goal of this forum is to avoid the kind of incendiary language used here. Speak plainly. Don't attempt to build consensus about whether Vaush sucks, give an argument instead.

What led you to predict that "bread tube" would be anti-AI? Do you find their position hypocritical? Anti-progress?