@monoamine's banner p

monoamine


				

				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users  
joined 2022 December 05 03:27:07 UTC

				

User ID: 1965

monoamine


				
				
				

				
1 follower   follows 0 users   joined 2022 December 05 03:27:07 UTC

					

No bio...


					

User ID: 1965

I like using my own slightly idiosyncratic definitions for things.

The definitions collide and contradict, a bit, such that an egalitarian leftist could be "rightist", but I don't mind it. Especially when you see tons of rightists demanding egalitarianism, albeit for solely their tribe/kind/ethnic group.

Arguing against any sort of care for morality is in fact a very right-wing position. Really, a right-wing child's position.

I think you are actually reversing the chronological order, there.

You do not actually have to do that at all.

Among lots of feminists, sure. I addressed that in the post, though. You are describing third-wave feminism, which I described as "third-wave feminism" in my post, but you are simply saying "feminism".

I largely don't, since it's mostly selection bias etc. There is potentially sometimes some truth to it, but not much. (There are some exceptions for, for example, autistic/Asperger's facial features. But autism is a lot more than just a personality trait.)

It is funny to joke about but it's mostly just right-coded pseudoscience and pseudointellectualism.

Society needs to lean much harder into non-blank-slatist atomic liberalism. (i.e., Scott Alexander Thought)

I would feel it would be more rational and, in particular, more moral to simply universally demand individualism, rather than say "people of this group or ethnicity are not sufficiently individualistic!" and violate the very contract you are attempting to enshrine. (This is basically why rightism is, at heart, an immoral and often irrational, hypocritical, and incoherent ideology. Some of the more intellectual far-right strains are more rational but trade that for being far more immoral.)

This is why I simply try not to associate with illiberals. I have a "one-drop rule" for it: even the slightest inclination towards this nature of thinking (collective attribution) for any group from any group means your whole mind and epistemology and morality are, essentially, completely fucked. There is no hope for such a person.

One area where even people who are generally of a liberal mindset tend to falter is judgment of men and women. I'd like to say the SJW/woke/third-wave feminist thing would've been very warranted since this was one of the main things it attempted to address, but unfortunately a ton of them - albeit not all - just did and do the same sort of thing towards men.

I also basically consider this a kind of "spiritual rightism". A huge number of leftists are essentially spiritual rightists with some moral luck + a bit flip.

I'm sure most people here are aware of it, but in modern parlance it first gained popularity in response to that neo-Nazi Walmart mass shooter who was depicted as "chudjak". "Chud" wasn't used much before then.

/images/17767019302056828.webp

Where can I find a (much more) left-wing community similar to The Motte? /r/slatestarcodex is close but obviously intentionally tries to avoid Culture War topics (spurring the creation of this place in the first place).

By left-wing, I solely mean on social issues ("progressive liberalism"), like immigration, race, sex, gender, gender identity, democracy, rule of law (which I guess is now a pro-left position in 2026 or something). On economics stuff a range of views would be fine. I'm a pro-free market pro-capitalist person, myself rather than a socialist. There's /leftypol/ but those are essentially all communists who are pro-authoritarianism and all of that and who are often even right-wing on social issues.

There are tons of Twitter clusters full of very smart center-left people who agree with me on everything but it's not quite what I'm looking for.

I would be fairly surprised if most of the ones who joined after January 2025 meet that description. Or, if it is most, it's cutting it close. I am basing that mostly on heuristics rather than strong evidence, but that's just how I'd lean.

I'll happily take suicidal empathy over homicidal antipathy.

Going by your comment and just looking at that URL, I am going to guess that that is misrepresented. So I will look it up...

And, indeed, he is alleged to have shoved someone. And he was acquitted. Kind of seems uninteresting. Nothing like the UK. I don't know the facts surrounding the physical altercation, but if he had never shoved someone I highly doubt he ever would've been arrested. Seems the legal system basically worked appropriately, here.

That's the UK though. They don't have a strong sense of liberal values encoded into their legal system.

I don't think it was or would be "terrorism lite", but it might be considered intimidation or harassment. (I support the protest's cause, but they should've done it outside of the church when the pastor was entering/leaving rather than interrupting the church service and entering the church.)

The most we know is he met with/talked with moot a few times and looked porn on 4chan. I would be somewhat surprised if he ever posted (words, anyway) or looked at any non-porn boards.

I'm a hardcore leftist and of course extremely anti-right and anti-Trump, but, yeah, I'm not seeing any new revelations about Trump, here, and so far there don't seem to be substantiated allegations Trump ever did anything sexual with anyone underage. I could think of hundreds of reasons to hate Trump and to consider him a terrible person and a terrible president, but the Epstein stuff is effectively just noise when it comes to him. If there's a bombshell regarding him and Epstein, everyone will know about it immediately.

Bill Gates though does have pedophile vibes.

I think you're probably just suffering from bias due to ideological disagreements with him. While Gates was/is clearly a creep, none of the emails suggest he did anything with any underage people, nor are there any other allegations or pieces of evidence pointing to that. He probably regularly cheated on his wife, and as the emails show he even contracted an STD from a prostitute, but I see no evidence or suggestion (or "vibes") he was a pedophile or did anything like that.

Always fun to check in on this place from time to time to see how far it's descended. I'm grateful at least /r/SlateStarCodex and most other rat-adjacent places are still sane.

  • -21