The sheer tide of transgenders seems like it would nullify any serious findings from this. I automatically picked the non-trans every time, except in the numerous occasions they were both trans
Nvidia is probably the AI good capabilitymaxxing US company, no? Although they're in a weird position now where Huang is both "AI super intelligence will take over all economic activity (except Nvidia chips)" and "AI is just a normal technology that won't replace everyone's jobs" in order to play their different stakeholders.
Similarly, they're also in the position of telling Trump how important it is for the US to beat China, but also they really need to sell all their chips to China.
you don't believe any of it because a falsehood in the text invalidates the claims of the text.
It's not really falsehood singular though, is it? How do you square the infallible word of God with the dozens if not hundreds of factual errors contained within the Bible?
Which part? "Next week" was more a figure of speech than a definitive prediction, "soon" would be more accurate. But it seems a difficult bet to judge purely using Trump's statements
- Prev
- Next

Yudkowsky is definitely going to be better known than Scott. The latter has heavily shied away from any kind of podcast stuff while Yud has gone all in with the launch of his book.
Which isn't to say that normies know anything about him, just that he's probably the best known of your list
More options
Context Copy link