thrownaway24e89172
wrong about everything
No bio...
User ID: 1081
Do you honestly not see why using pictures of real people to create sexual images might be offensive, even if the woman in question was sexually active? Would you not care if someone used a photo of you to create something like that and distributed it?
I absolutely think it is offensive. I don't think society should protect women from being so offended because society refuses to protect men from it. Nobody gave a rat's ass when girls were distributing pictures of 5-year-old me naked in high school, using them to openly sexually harass me. They wouldn't even confiscate the pictures. Women demand gender equality, which means they can either grow a fucking thick skin and ignore it like we expect men to or kill themselves in shame like men who can't do.
To end the wars of the sexes, make women property again.
There's no need to "make women property" here. Removing their ability to avoid the consequences of their poor choices to a much greater extent than men should be more than sufficient.
Well, for some people anyway. Those of us born with the wrong parts are typically exempt from needing to provide consent, though for some reason we're still expected to obtain it.
- Prev
- Next

Isn't that covered under the second due to the wording (emphasis mine) "more likely to report being sexually assaulted"?
More options
Context Copy link