I don't see how "the CEO killer was right" and "Luigi was not the CEO killer" are incompatible ideas. This comment below gives the argument more or less as I've seen it: the government needed to frame someone because letting someone who assassinated a CEO get away with it would break the social order. So they support the real killer for having killed someone they think should have been killed and they support Luigi because being framed is bad.
I don't see how "the CEO killer was right" and "Luigi was not the CEO killer" are incompatible ideas. This comment below gives the argument more or less as I've seen it: the government needed to frame someone because letting someone who assassinated a CEO get away with it would break the social order. So they support the real killer for having killed someone they think should have been killed and they support Luigi because being framed is bad.
More options
Context Copy link