wemptronics
No bio...
User ID: 95
I found the NSS a mixed bag. Some parts I appreciated and agreed with. It's good some of these statements are on the record as considerations of strategy. A great deal of the rest seems incomplete or amateur in typical Trumpian fashion. An intent of simplicity stated up front by necessity, because there's no real plan, no diligence-- certainly no 4D chess.
Western-hemispheric control, a revitalizing of the Monroe Doctrine.
What is the vision here? The US survived for the duration of the Cold War with its home turf contested. Is the idea Europe falls to the wolves and we hope to make Brazil the new Germany of South America? America turn the meme of BRICS into a reality by investing in it? Explaining it as a ratchet in the scare Europe straight toolbox would be neat, but I'm not sure I believe it.
Bullying Venezuela is great and all, but who cares about Venezuela? We're not retreating from the Pacific, we're just focusing on our own hemisphere. Okay, for what? What will our efforts and focus achieve? A thing to do because we decided not to do the other thing.
wemptronics
17d ago
Technical issues aside, I've had the thought the place would benefit from some limited grass roots marketing. Once or twice a year mods could pick a week and suggest holding a goodpost for it. When it hits everyone all at once breaks the don't talk about Fight Club rule:
Finally, in the interest of the health of this community, we ask that you do not post links to this community on other high-participation platforms. They are invitations for users unfamiliar with our norms to come here and (often angrily) make posts that break our rules. Exceptions may be made for communities specifically designed for compatible content, but these will be examined by the moderators on a case by case basis. If in doubt, please ask first by messaging the moderators.
For 5-7 days people are encouraged to blast links into the ether. Twitter, Substack, reddit, or wherever. This results in an influx which results in a period of managed headache. Downsides are this might result in more attacks, unwanted attention, or permanent damage to a fragile ecological system.
Back in March I read many of the accounts in the 7 October Parliamentary Commission Report which attempted to document all recorded attacks of the day. Based on that, a common role for female IDF women kidnapped or killed on October 7th were in listening or surveillance outposts along the border. There were at least a couple instances of women (and men, too) holing up in a command post or signals room while others put up resistance waiting for relief. I got the vibe that the border gals weren't really expected to engage in combat if it could be avoided. Of those that had a chance to react they were placed in last stand territory. They were not, generally, put out to defend the wire.
Most "low information" consumers know production is inauthentic. They are not bothered by this while they enjoy the 31st season of The Bachelor. Another segment of somewhat higher information consumers knows and considers the production (inauthenticity) doesn't end with the 31st season of The Bachelor. Production reaches into their TikTok feeds and their least favorite political party's national convention. It merges with and invades their hobbies, interests, and relationships. It reaches out and touches them when as their crush posts a new cute Instagram story dancing to some music.
"What is real?" used to be understood as an appropriate question for smoke filled dorm rooms and entertainment. It has never
~beenfelt more appropriate to ask this question than while facing a screen. We happen to do that a lot. The philosophy major with bloodshot eyes might not be able to understand, but for this segment of consumers this an uncomfortable question with uncertain answers. Production -- theatrics, marketing, controversy -- has taken over the commons. This may not be unprecedented experience, but it is probably unprecedented at scale and presence.Discernment takes a lot of energy and time. Ain't nobody got time for that. An inaccurate, but simple categorization system is more useful than uncertain consideration. The hack the nerds don't want you to know is to develop and tune heuristics. Fine, when and by how much? Who do I trust to tune if not the cool dudes who see what I can see and are like me? What is a heuristic anyway? If we feel mean we might dub this a Midwit Consumer Demographic. We don't feel mean though, so we say the path of least resistance is the most natural thing in the world. Better to be guarded by overzealous "fake" categorization than to feel duped like some jabroni. Even the most normie consumers share this perspective at times, perhaps as they read the latest Instagram story debunking junk that bamboozled unwitting others.
I don't know if the epistemic rot is worse on an individual level than a hundred years ago, but if a person wanted to host an everything is fake brainworm they've never been more able to find vindication. The algorithm, its production and theatrics, is always on The Feed. We should probably be more concerned if this segment of people didn't increase after growing distrust of institutions and the evolution of brainhacks-- institutions that do frequently earn a degraded reputation. They fuck up, spectacularly so, and it's prudent to be suspicious of actors that profit off of a fuck-up.
I'm sufficiently conditioned to tolerate a fake mistake technique or the ol' "accidental" release of a trailer. Leveraging an unplanned mistake is the role of PR, so you can't blame them for that. The same types of people, if not the very same ones, do often enough somehow, someway, end up in yet another racist race swap controversy discourse for the latest Disney publicity campaign. While there is a "look in the mirror" defense of these kinds of tactics I don't find them convincing. It's not conspiracy, it's incentives all the way down-- "accident" or not. I'll still cover my bases: the schizos are always right.
More options
Context Copy link