zPvQINBQvfFR
No bio...
User ID: 277
zPvQINBQvfFR
17d ago
This seems very likely to me to be an open-and-shut case of unconstitutional discrimination on the basis of religion by a state employee, and I see zero argument for why it should not be pursued more or less exactly as it has been.
Ackshually... I wonder. It might be viewpoint discrimination, but is it religious viewpoint discrimination? If a student submitted an essay equally critical of trans stuff, but based it on appeals to evolutionary psychology and HBD and inescapable biological realities, I imagine they would get treated similarly.
So it's not clear that religion is the motivating factor here. I don't know if whatever rules there are against religious discrimination would extend to atheistic holders of naughty opinions, but I suspect they wouldn't.
Nobody reasonable wants to throw nuclear waste into the river. What reasonable people want is to vitrify it and then keep it in containers in a parking lot-sized storage yard in the middle of nowhere and enventually maybe reprocess it.
The unreasonable people want to spend ridiculous amounts of money to bury it all underground or something because nuclear waste remains radioactive for millions of years and let's ignore the fact that the longer half-life something has, the less dangerous it is.
More options
Context Copy link