zPvQINBQvfFR
No bio...
User ID: 277
The "Mike Jackson" part seemed really on the nose, but reality is stranger than fiction.
These are the days of progress towards the Singularity, just believe in and hold fast to the shining vision of paradise on Earth!
A whole lot of people died due to boiler explosions in the early days of the industrial revolution, but in the end it all turned out quite awesome. (In the old sense of being grand and powerful. Don't @ me, Uncle Ted fans.)
This pattern of argument is not convincing -- where people bring up anecdotes about most spectacular fuck-ups and then use them as basis for sarcastically mocking the idea that anything useful could come from this.
So, I'm kind of clueless about this, but are reasoning models are actually different models, as in different neural net weights?
Like, do you get a reasoning model by running a single-pass model in a loop where you feed it prompts like: "first, understand the problem and make a plan for solving it, formatted like this", then "here's the plan you thought up before, try to execute point 1 now", and so on?
Or do you need a different model specially-trained for this kind of thing and it's a big secret black box how it all works?
- Prev
- Next

All those examples look like shallow references where a thing was named after a biblical or Catholic thing to sound slightly cooler. Are any of those media Christian beyond that?
More options
Context Copy link