This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
What exactly is the nature of this Jewish influence? If we're still talking about the UK, I can only think of the Corbyn situation, and that strikes me as pretty weak. If he'd been openly friendly with the KKK, and refused to even say that associating with them might have been poor judgement, then the gigantic number of articles you'd have seen written by black journalists about how frightened they were by the prospect of his premiership would probably dwarf those written by jews in rough accordance to the ratio of black people to Jews. I wouldn't say that would be an example of "black influence".
The most obvious element is that it is very dangerous to stand up in public and discussion Jewish overrepresentation. Beyond that, I think that the continued mawkish emphasis of the Holocaust in my country is mostly down to Jewish activism; it was horrible, but it happened hundreds of miles away, in a totally different country with whom we were at war, seventy years ago. And yet we are spending 100m of public money in 2024 to pave over a park in Central London so that it can be turned into a Holocaust memorial*, even rewriting our own planning laws because they forbid it, and heavily implying that the only difference between Britain and Nazi Germany is that the anti-semitic fascists happened to turn up there and not here.
Beyond those two points, I have no idea what influence is going on behind the scenes. I hope not too much, but I am not so naive as to think that a group with disproportionate influence is not wielding it at all. Thus my desire for transparency.
*The designer of the memorial has said publicly that ruining the pleasure of people who people who want to use the park is key to the memorial's effect.
I appreciate that but that's true or any minority in the UK . How secure would your job be if you tried to discuss Indian overrepresentation? Or black overrepresentation at the other end? I'm not even sure Jews are overrepresented in the UK. I can only think of a small handful of political figures/journalists. Alan Sugar I suppose?
I'd want to see evidence of that. I'm sure Jewish communities appreciate it being remembered but the Holocaust is emphasised far more IMO in order to underline that we in the UK were on the "right side" of the war, against the indescribably terrible Nazis. It's basically our crowning 20th century achievement! Compare that to our relationship with WWI, where even though we won and didn't lose our empire immediately afterwards, the main sentiment towards it is almost one of national regret that our incompetent (in the public imagination) leadership frivolously threw away the lives of so many young men. Could you imagine any piece of media depicting the role of UK in WWII similarly to how it is in Blackadder goes forth?
I haven't heard about this, so would be interested in learning more. Did this happen because Jews were clamoring for public money to be spent on ruining green spaces in London? I'd assume this is far more likely to be the brainchild of the sort of public sector worker who put Hadiths on the display board in KX, and likes bringing up the Holocaust so they can claim that it's imperative we don't allow "fascists" (i.e. anyone opposed to immigration) to get into power, because clearly we're only ever a hair's breadth at most from what happened in Germany in the 30s.
So apart from not being able to discuss the influence of British Jews, what is the main influence of British Jews (beyond that they're probably up to something)? It's not like they even affect our relationship with Israel that much, tied as it is to American foreign policy in the region. Most of the media left of the Telegraph is pretty relentlessly hostile to Israel, and it's hard to imagine a group with much influence allowing London to be taken over most weekends by thousands of people chanting genocidal chants about them. If anything increasing Muslim immigration is likelier to play a far larger role in affecting our geopolitical stances in the future, and Indian immigration has already led to a member of that group being Prime Minister (the Jews, despite having been here much longer, haven't had one since Disraeli). It seems like Jews are one of the least influential groups in the country.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link