This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
What if the authorities had a track record of previously discriminating against pink VW Beetle owners, would you still expect the owners to trust the authorities to use their powers for good? Perhaps they were only allowed to live among other pink VW Beetle owners and prior to that Pink VW Beetle drivers were forced to entertain people by re-enacting a pinker version of Herbie the Love Bug without recompense for many years. And those that fled were apprehended, returned, and perhaps even had their Beetle destroyed. They also had to drive their Beetles in parades in order to claim rights other car owners already had. Sure, maybe they would use their power to only arrest the pedo pink VW Beetle driver, but how sure would you feel that it would never be turned against the rest?
Perhaps you could combat this by enacting policies to recruit pink VW Beetle owners into positions of power, to give them more of a say in governance, and success but non pink VW drivers may think this is favoritism, and some other pink VW Beetle owners may think those taking this opportunity have sold out, and are now working for big Mercedes.
We can draw this across to gun control too, many 2A people I know say that even if there was an idea they think might be useful (say around mental health checks and guns being taken while being carried out, as most gunnies in rural PA seem to have some story of someone they know shooting themselves), they couldn't trust the government to not use this power to simply try and confiscate guns more broadly as part of a ratcheting approach.
In other words you can't evaluate the responses to what might seem like perfectly sensible laws, without looking at the history, because people are not perfectly optimized decision making machines, they decide on feelings and those are informed by what has gone before, and what they have personally experienced. If your grandfather was arrested for parking his pink VW Beetle in a blue Camry only spot, would you really feel confident that new laws targeting Pink VW Beetle drivers would be fair?
More options
Context Copy link