This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Sorry for the late response, but I'm a bit confused that you seem to only consider the possibility that e.g. the French successfully spying on the US would be revealed by the US. Considering the power gradient between France and the USA and the discomfort many Americans themselves have with their government wielding its power abroad (to say nothing of the non-Americans, wrt the American government), the thing I'd expect to see, if France did that, would be France to use its findings publicly: e.g. if the US did something against the interests of France, like, say, disrupting a hypothetical Russia-France pipeline or scooping a real France-Australia arms deal, to drop some information in public of seedy things that the US got up to, whether it is the disruption itself or something else that the US would lose status over if it got confirmation by something with the stature of the French government. (CIA rendition flights? Funding of unsavoury rebellions? Bribes?)
That we haven't seen such an instance of an uneasily allied government working to lower the status of the US (ever, as far as I know) seems to imply that either there is no obtainable information that would achieve that (which strikes me as unlikely, considering the above three examples which are almost certainly factual + Snowden cache details), they never stand anything to gain from that (which... I guess I can't rule out, in particular in the shape of the US credibly threatening any allied security service that would dare participate in this) or they don't actually have the information.
More options
Context Copy link