site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of October 24, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

20
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

From what I've seen about this movie online, it looked like it was being marketed to gays only - a movie ABOUT being gay made BY gay men FOR gay men! So it's not surprising that straight people generally went "Okay, not for me, I get it" and didn't bother going, whatever about its merits as a comedy or a romantic comedy.

But I think this is going to be the hard, economic realisation: yeah great, all this minority representation and mainstreaming. But if you're still anywhere between only 1-10% of the population, that's your market. If you can't make money off only appealing to 10% of the audience, then you have to make your product more appealing to a wider audience.

I have no interest in the new Top Gun movie, but that's okay: enough people liked the old movie that they wanted to go and see the new one. Nobody expects that it would be a reasonable excuse, had the new movie flopped, for the producers to demand everyone go and see it or else they hate (I dunno, cool fighter jets?) I mean, I do like cool fighter jets, but not enough to sit through a Tom Cruise movie.

So demanding "I made a movie for 10% of the movie-going audience, turns out that's not enough to turn a profit, and it's the viewers fault for not going because they're homophobic" is a stupid excuse that should not be tolerated.

Romcoms are date movies. If you can make it funny enough that a guy will sit through ninety minutes of mushy romance, and mushy romance enough that a woman will sit through fart jokes and crude humour, then people will go see it. If your major selling point is "I'm gay and I star in this!", why would anyone go? Why would even gay guys go?