This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Speculating about the motive and practical execution of the attack is not the same as endorsing it. I think hammer attacks are bad. I hope that no Democrats are attacked with hammers. I feel bad for Paul Pelosi. Even if he and his wife have been getting rich via insider trading during her decades in Congress, it's not OK to attack either of them with hammers. Or even break into their house to tape them up and talk to them. It's bad. Don't do it.
Now, whether Depape is a right-wing crazy person (with BLM and Rainbow signs in his yard), or a random crazy person, or a crazy gay hustler, is a completely separate question.
There used to be a sense on the Left that rich people indulged in a lot of exploitative and perverse shit and got away with it thanks to their influence on media and law enforcement. Now that the Left have become rich and powerful with heavy influence on the media and law enforcement in their deep blue cities, they strangely don't seem concerned with the misbehaviors of the rich or telling the truth about what happens when they are involved in some kind of suspicious event. I guess that's the job of the Right now. I'd rather the Left and Right cooperate on holding the powerful accountable.
More options
Context Copy link