This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
A lot of these problems are individually solved -- the Bigscreen Beyond weighs 150 grams, consistent 90hz framerate is the low end of new headsets and 120hz the up-and-coming standard, low-latency wireless video is a (admittedly even dweebier) SpaceX when it comes to doing what a lot of people were calling impossible five years ago, even cheap sensors are vastly improved and hardware sensor fusion is the default option -- and there's incoming tech that'll merge most of these.
(Long battery life + wireless + ultralightweight is, admittedly, hard)
The intermediate trouble is that the people interested in the current tech are a tiny community, they're near-invisible to outsiders while what portals into the world are available give a poor or actively misleading grasp on the state of current tech, and the minimum cost of buyin for a not-awful experience ranges from hundreds to thousands of dollars.
The bigger problem for Meta, specifically, is that even if they get past all that, it's not clear how they make money off it. There are business models for VR that make sense, for better or worse -- but none of them make sense for Meta; they're either things Meta are actively bad at, have competitors that are eating their lunch with Meta's own hardware, or could easily have a million competitors in three years.
More options
Context Copy link