site banner
naraburns  nihil supernum  1yr ago (text post)   Edited 1yr ago   18904 thread views

USA Election Day 2022 Megathread

Tuesday November 8, 2022 is Election Day in the United States of America. In addition to Congressional "midterms" at the federal level, many state governors and other more local offices are up for grabs. Given how things shook out over Election Day 2020, things could get a little crazy.

...or, perhaps, not! But here's the Megathread for if they do. Talk about your local concerns, your national predictions, your suspicions re: election fraud and interference, how you plan to vote, anything election related is welcome here. Culture War thread rules apply, with the addition of Small-Scale Questions and election-related "Bare Links" allowed in this thread only (unfortunately, there will not be a subthread repository due to current technical limitations).

15
Top Bottom New Old Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

As far as I can tell, Maricopa's statement was the last word on this topic,

So topic closed? You wrote all of this on an election thread to say someone else is wrong?

In my opinion, you're being very biased with your analysis.

What is your goal here?

You wrote all of this on an election thread to say someone else is wrong?

This is a discussion forum. Writing something large and detailed to disagree with someone else is our bread and butter.

I made an effort to check DradisPing's claims on my own and only then did I ask multiple clarifying questions:

  • what is your source that Sharpiegate v2.0 was confirmed?

  • What is your evidence that bleed through caused votes to be lost? How many votes exactly?

  • Do you have a source besides your recollection?

  • what is the evidence that ballots were invalidated?

  • Has anything come up since to contradict [Maricopa's] claims?

Except for DradisPing citing their "recollection" as the source, none of the questions were answered. So on what basis do you claim that my analysis is "very biased"? What would you suggest I do differently? I'm listening.

As for my goal, it mirrors the site's banner text:

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases.

So when I see people make mistakes, and those mistakes fall along a predictable line, I'm curious to know why that happens. I would assume others would share my curiosity, isn't that why we're all here? I aim to please, and hopefully I can help someone discover why they keep falling into the same trap. If you disagree with my efforts, what would you suggest I do differently? Still listening.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats