This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
No, and I showed as much by offering post-scarcity as another way of thinking. However scarcity along with defectors and adversaries are perennial elements that don't go away through wishing it were so. You recognise that people can be perverse, greedy, wilful and psychopathic (and worst of all it's often to their limited benefit to be that way). How are we going to stop them depriving others of resources or compel the dispossession of what they have deprived others of without resorting to force or the credible threat thereof?
Like yourself I'd prefer a more humane system, but appeals to humanity pale. Addressing this problem is a prerequisite for forming an alternative.
Where? I just looked. Unless you're referring to "gay luxury space communism" which I took as sardonic. I responded to it, though, even so, and I acknowledged it. Obviously, I wasn't referring to that but to your first two paragraphs, which seems clear you think are far more realistic.
Bucky disagreed, and that was a long time ago before we have the tech we have today. He disagreed that there was any non-human factor that has ever necessitated scarcity. Scarcity would be a thing of the past forever and ever if there were any desire to end it on the part of those with the means, or if there were any desire to end it on the part of those who could compel those with the means to stop being such murderous assholes.
I recognize that people can be perverse, greedy, willful, and psychopathic. All of those are remediable. How are we going to change that and stop them from depriving others? Your answer seems to be, well, just deprive first. My answer is: stop glorifying it and worshiping predators, for a start. Or even a smaller baby step: start being honest that we've glorified it and worshiped predators. Let's try that and see what happens.
Yeah --appeals to humanity only work with the human. That's why rights are a scam. The only people against whom rights could protect us are the very ones who couldn't give a shit about them. Arguing with the devil whose only interest in reason is how he can use it against you.
The most potent force I've found against liars, bullshitters, psychopaths, etc., is honesty: aggressive, no-holds-barred honesty. Won't change a psychopath, but it definitely changes their followers. And what are they without followers?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link