This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I've never encountered Fuentes in long form and I'm really only familiar with the sort of joking-not-joking clips like what you've linked there, but it strikes me as pretty weird for a "white nationalist" to be actively promoting Kanye West. Antisemitism can make for strange bedfellows, I suppose, but it seems a lot more like Fuentes just actually doesn't mind siding with a black guy that he's on the same page with politically, which is pretty antithetical to being an actual white nationalist.
I guess it's hard for me to be Tim Pool in this conversation. I know that acknowledging the point is going to get me more trouble than it's worth, but I also know that the point is so obviously correct that there isn't any plausible argument against it. Every now and then people push back against the "the black vote" or "the Hispanic vote" or "the LGBTQIA2S+ community" monikers on the basis that these aren't monoliths and they often differ on issues, but it's usually pretty weak pushback because we all know that there actually are shared characteristics and interest in these groups. We can come up with historical reasons why noticing the interests of "the Jews" is more impolite than other groups, but none of them really make a whole lot of sense in the 2022 United States. So, if I was to put aside my interests in avoiding an unpleasant encounter with the ADL, I suppose I'd agree with Kanye that it's actually kind of fishy that it's OK to refer to "the Mormons" as controlling Utah, but not "the Jews" controlling record labels.
I don't think it's antithetical. "White nationalist" means "advocating a white national identity." That could mean wanting to maintain a white majority in historically white countries, or it could mean creating a new nation-state to function as a white homeland. Fuentes claims to be the former, though he prefers the phrase "white majoritarian" as a descriptor. And honestly, I don't think there's anything wrong with that. I think Peter Brimelow and Jared Taylor are respectable people. Neither of them have ever given me the impression that they don't think the holocaust was both real and bad. Nick has, and that's why I find it troublesome that Kanye is associating with him. But as I said before, the way Kanye is being treated is the kind of thing that leads to radicalization, so I shouldn't be too surprised.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link