This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I assume you agree, then, that the progressive push towards showing disproportionately more minorities in media for representation and to combat erasure, etc etc., is similarly ill-argued.
I actually didn't express an opinion that the claim was ill-argued, but rather that it was not argued at all. I suppose that 30 years ago the existence of certain groups was probably ignored by children's literature, though I don't know that "erasure" is the best term to describe that phenomenon. Regardless, that is no longer the case. Nor is it likely to be the case that OP's demographic is ignored in the children's literature currently available for sale.
BTW, is it safe to assume that you agree that complaints about Halle Bailey being cast as the Little Mermaid are misplaced, as well?
On the Little Mermaid, I actually don't really have much of a slant either way on that issue. My first reaction was "who gives a shit?" and I didn't dig further afterwards; "Black Little Mermaid" is literally all I know about it.
On further inspection, I think explicit race-casting is cringey as hell, and that there's a little bit of dissonance with what is a very European trope - merfolk, esp. that particular sort -being brought into a deliberately race-agnostic environment.
At the same time, I believe history and mythology belong to the entirety of humanity, and really, as long as you can make it internally consistent (which isn't necessarily a given) who gives a toss? I'm not white, though, which gives me a different vantage point on this whole affair.
It reads much better than the travesty that was the Ghost in the Shell Hollywood adaptation, which was just schizophrenic in how it wanted to approach race, for example. I'd argue it's probably better than if you did a brownwashed Tale of the Bamboo Cutter, or whatever the Fate franchise does to historical figures.
Honestly my entire point is - I just think telling people who are complaining that they aren't being properly being represented that they make no sense, when the reason for that misrepresentation is due to a push by another group to overrepresent themselves for similar reasons, reads like intentional selective blindness with how the context is just ignored.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link