This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
If the system can just arbitrarily decide to not protect them, that seems like pretty good evidence it's not acting in their interests.
The BLM movement's main issue is that they believe police-as-we-know-it is a bad (and in particular systematically racist) way to handle public safety / law enforcement and that those issues should be handled by different organizations than what we currently call "police" (or at least that the current police should play a smaller role). The police murdering black people directly and the police deciding to do nothing about others murdering black people are both reasons for black people to not like the police.
The system did not "arbitrarily decide to not protect them". The loudest section of the Black Community, and the much louder social groups that blacks allow to speak for them, demanded that police stop protecting them, and enforced these demands with overwhelming social and physical compulsion.
There are no shortage of deep-blue cities and even states where such a policy could be implemented exactly as Blues might wish it, completely unconstrained by Red interference. No such system has ever been demonstrated. If such a system were indeed possible, probably it should have been developed and deployed and its efficacy demonstrated, rather than gutting the existing system with no replacement on-deck.
But hey, no rush. As demonstrated in this thread, most people aren't even aware that any of this has happened. The people who believed, falsely, that thousands of unarmed, innocent blacks were being killed by a racist police force are blissfully unaware that the murder rate among blacks is currently a line going straight up, because the people who sold them the former lie have declined to enlighten them to the later reality. After all, it's just thousands of extra dead Black people per year for the indefinite future, the annihilation of three decades of social engineering nation-wide. Obviously more important issues obtain, and will continue to until memories grow foggy enough to allow this entire fracas to be blamed on racist Reds.
I think the elections since the George Floyd protests show pretty clearly that this isn't a straight-forward Blue vs. Red issue. Portland, about as deep-blue as it gets, re-elected Ted Wheeler, for instance. I recall police reform not going over well in the NYC mayor election either.
While writing "Black Lives Matter" on things may be popular among the Blue Tribe, implementing their policy proposals seems to consistently lose at the ballot box.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link