This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
So you're positing that the government is doing a massive psyop to...do untold things only to people with an active retrovirus infection (e.g. people with low HIV viral load wouldn't be nearly as susceptible), which might not even work because mRNA vaccines aren't actually using normal nucleosides but instead synthetic, modified nucleosides?
Wouldn't patients with an active HIV infection have, you know, more things to be concerned about, like their active HIV infection?
(Whether they would work would be an open question, but I could - with no knowledge of these particular nucleoside analogues - just as/even more convincingly say that it's protective against genome insertion especially compared to an actual infection, since after all, nucleoside analogues are exactly one of the ways we treat HIV via blocking reverse transcription!)
If they're lying about this, they could be lying about anything, couldn't they? HIV could actually not be a retrovirus and be some sort of coordinated poisoning of homosexuals that accidentally leaked to the heterosexual population. COVID could actually be a retrovirus (despite all 30k bp of the virus being public knowledge), and using an mRNA vaccine with is actually protective because we're reducing the chance of viral integration into the genome!
Especially since the sequences used for the vaccines are public knowledge for ages now! And when international labs sequenced it, they did find something interesting...just not about this particular conspiracy, but the lab leak one!
(Or maybe the entire world's labs are just in on one giant joke?)
As an aside, food and drink would be extremely implausible. It would have to survive heat and cold and digestion, unless you're alleging that government agents are clandestinely spraying synthetic viruses onto masses of foodstuff just before they're served.
And people would do this in such an obviously stupid way...why? If you wanted to run stupid experiments that are essentially the equivalent of throwing tomatoes into a shredder and seeing if one tomato manages to reconstitute itself perfectly as it falls, you could...use lab animals!
It would also depend on what integration mechanism is used. Retroviral integrases and integration complexes usually preferentially bind to sites of high transcription...which would suggest that you'd have a permanent transcription of spike protein sitting there waiting to be degraded and not doing much else.
If instead your aim was to do the maximum evulz, this is again an extremely expensive and inefficient way to do it, given that most people wouldn't even be susceptible!
(That wouldn't pass any sort of ethics committee, but neither would the human version you're suggesting, so what gives?)
The point is that, based on very public knowledge about the vaccine verified by many parties throughout the world, this was very obviously not something meant to gene edit the majority of humanity in any way for any benign or nefarious purpose.
Practically the entire world would have to be lying about the vaccine for this to work, including China, which explicitly has been pushing Sinovac to the exclusion of the mRNA vaccines despite its lower efficacy!
There are concerns regarding such a new technology first applied to humans, true. Some of it even makes sense (e.g. overlapping ORFs being a theoretical risk)! But none of it even remotely approaches what you're alleging.
More options
Context Copy link