site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of January 9, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

14
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If moral worth comes from intelligence, then there is always someone smarter than you, and so they have the right to kill you/abuse you because "you clearly have much less of all of life than I do".

This is the exact attitude I was getting at, with old assumptions that the poor were just of coarser grade than their betters, so they could more easily endure pain and disappointment because they were too stupid and too insensitive to feel suffering in the same, elevated, rarified way their superiors with their more delicate constitutions and refined senses did.

And naturally, if they are inferior in sensibility, they are inferior all round so it's okay to mistreat, exploit and abuse them since they don't feel it, you know. Not like we do:

(Madred has brought his daughter to work, and a pet in a cage. Picard is sitting slumped in the chair, wearing a loose tunic)

MADRED: I want you to be very careful with your wompat from now on, Jil Orra. Now that she's separated from her mother, she depends on you.

JIL ORRA: I will, father. Do humans have mothers and fathers?

MADRED: Yes, but human mothers and fathers don't love their children as we do. They're not the same as we are.

JIL ORRA: Will you read to me tonight?

MADRED: Yes, of course I will. I'll see you later.

(Jil leaves carrying her pet)

PICARD: Your daughter is lovely.

MADRED: Yes, I think so. And unusually bright. It's amazing, isn't it, the way they're able to sneak into your heart. I must admit, I was completely >unprepared for the power she had over me from the moment she was born.

PICARD: I'm surprised that you let her come in here.

MADRED: Why?

PICARD: To expose a child to this. To someone who is suffering. To see that it is you that inflict that suffering.

MADRED: From the time Jil Orra could crawl she's been taught about the enemies of the Cardassians, and that enemies deserve their fate.

PICARD: When children learn to devalue others, they can devalue anyone, including their parents.

If moral worth comes from intelligence, then there is always someone smarter than you, and so they have the right to kill you/abuse you because "you clearly have much less of all of life than I do".

This isn't fair at all. At best you could claim that they have the right to kill you to save their own life. Nobody has the right to cause suffering just because they're more morally valuable. Humans are worth more than cows; that doesn't mean we have the rightto torture them.

If moral worth comes from intelligence, then there is always someone smarter than you, and so they have the right to kill you/abuse you because "you clearly have much less of all of life than I do".

Yeah, if you posit 'killing is always wrong and everyone has equal moral worth', you can conclude that 'killing is always wrong and everyone has equal moral worth'. Except for cows, apparently. Seriously, how do cows, or rabbits, or fish fit into this equation? Evolution very cleanly demonstrates they're mostly the same as us, mechanically - just a lot dumber. Yet we're free to kill them, or at least let them perish painfully by the billions in the wild, because ... ? I respect EA for taking the ideas they believe seriously!