This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Based on what? He shot a political figure, he wrote "Hey fascist! Catch!" and "Oh bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao" on the bullet casings (the latter being a WW2 anti-fascist song often used by left-wing activists in general and antifa in particular, it also concluded the manifesto of the guy who attacked an ICE facility in 2019), and apparently he was telling his family about how Charlie Kirk was spreading hate. All of those seem pretty political to me, and conversely the evidence of him being apolitical is that...he didn't have a party registration? And that he also put some jokes on his bullet casings instead of making them all political slogans? Sometimes people engaging in political violence are just insane or have incoherent politics, but so far there's no evidence of that, his views seem pretty straightforward.
Well yeah, both of the political statements on the casings seem antifa associated. That doesn't mean he was radicalized by a specifically antifa group, "Charlie Kirk was a fascist and deserved death" is an opinion held more widely than that. Nor does it mean he was involved with any sort of formal political group rather than just browsing the internet. But it does seem likely he picked up his political opinions online, that's pretty much the default assumption nowadays, especially for someone writing internet memes on bullet casings and called a "Reddit kid" by a schoolmate. You're acting superior to those idiots on Twitter but "antifa views he picked up online" is better supported by the evidence than "little concern for politics" is.
He didn't seem apolitical to me, it's just that his public political affiliation was vaguely technocratic centrism. (A dumb version of technocratic centrism that didn't really understand the healthcare industry, but that's common enough.) He frequently commented on politics on Twitter, just not in a heavily partisan way. (Also I vaguely remember an account that in his personal life he he expressed pretty different and more extreme views?)
Note that he wrote a short manifesto which didn't mention this.
More options
Context Copy link